Binary Defense vs Defendable
Binary Defense is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Binary Defense targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Defendable serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Binary Defense includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for Defendable (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
Binary Defense is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Binary Defense targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Defendable serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Binary Defense includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for Defendable (Endpoint).
Binary Defense (Pure-play MDR) and Defendable (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Binary Defense's binary defense's core differentiator is proactive threat hunting with an attacker's mindset, cons... or Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise organizations with existing EDR/SIEM investments they want to keep | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 4/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations with existing EDR/SIEM investments they want to keep
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Binary DefenseTECH-AGNOSTIC | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointCrowdStrike FalconSentinelOneCarbon Black | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkExabeamPalo Alto Cortex XSIAMGoogle Chronicle Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainDisable accountsCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Custom quotes only. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤30 minutes | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. MDR and MDR Plus tiers. Co-managed and fully managed options available. | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | MDR Plus features (deception, malware disruption) are add-ons beyond base MDR. IR is not included in base MDR, available as separate retainer. Requires direct connection to client network, VPN may impact delivery. Pricing not publicly disclosed, requires sales engagement | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Monthly, Annual, Multi-year | Custom, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | SlackEmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North America | Europe |
| Onboarding | 2-8 weeks depending on environment complexity. Requires direct connection to client network. | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. |
| Industry focus | ManufacturingHealthcareFinancial ServicesTechnologyRetail | Not published |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights rates 4.6/5 (30 reviews) and PeerSpot 9.2/10. Forrester Strong Performer in Q1 2025 (was Leader in 2021) with highest possible scores for endpoint detection, threat hunting, and community. Praise for technical depth, but Glassdoor employee rating is 2.5/5, and some customers report declining service quality. | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, privacy) | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
| Data retention | Not published. | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Binary Defense and Defendable?
Binary Defense is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Binary Defense offers ≤30 minutes, Defendable offers Not disclosed. Binary Defense covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for Defendable.
How do Binary Defense and Defendable differ in response capabilities?
Binary Defense supports 4 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Binary Defense pricing compare to Defendable?
Binary Defense pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. Defendable pricing: Not published. Watch for with Binary Defense: MDR Plus features (deception, malware disruption) are add-ons beyond base MDR; IR is not included in base MDR, available as separate retainer. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published..
Should I choose Binary Defense or Defendable?
Choose Binary Defense if: mid-market and enterprise organizations with existing EDR/SIEM investments they want to keep. Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Binary Defense is not ideal for organizations needing global SOC coverage (SOC is US-based only, analysts work remotely). Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.