Binary Defense vs Daylight Security: MDR comparison 2026
Binary Defense is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Binary Defense targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Daylight Security serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Binary Defense includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for Daylight Security (Endpoint).
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose Binary Defense if:
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations with existing EDR/SIEM investments they want to keep
- •Security teams that value proactive threat hunting and want deep technical partnership
- •Organizations that prioritize data portability and want to avoid vendor lock-in
- •You need Cloud and Identity and Network coverage included in base pricing
Choose Daylight Security if:
- •Mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers
- •Technology and finance companies comfortable adopting early-stage vendors with tier-1 VC backing
- •Teams wanting ChatOps-native collaboration via Slack/Teams with sub-hour deployment time
Bottom line: Binary Defense (Pure-play MDR) and Daylight Security (Platform vendor) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Binary Defense's binary defense's core differentiator is proactive threat hunting with an attacker's mindset, cons... or Daylight Security's ai-native mdr that deploys in under an hour and works with your existing edr.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Binary Defense and Daylight Security?
Binary Defense is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Binary Defense offers ≤30 minutes, Daylight Security offers Not disclosed. Binary Defense covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for Daylight Security.
How do Binary Defense and Daylight Security differ in response capabilities?
Binary Defense supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment, account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Daylight Security supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Binary Defense and included with Daylight Security.
How does Binary Defense pricing compare to Daylight Security?
Binary Defense pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. Daylight Security pricing: $10-30/endpoint/month. Annual contracts typically $115,000-$130,000 for mid-market.. Watch for with Binary Defense: MDR Plus features (deception, malware disruption) are add-ons beyond base MDR; IR is not included in base MDR, available as separate retainer. Watch for with Daylight Security: Founded late 2024 with no public compliance certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001). If your procurement requires these, you may face delays or blockers.; Identity and cloud workload modules are on the roadmap but not GA. You may need separate tooling for those surfaces now..
Should I choose Binary Defense or Daylight Security?
Choose Binary Defense if: mid-market and enterprise organizations with existing EDR/SIEM investments they want to keep. Choose Daylight Security if: mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers. Binary Defense is not ideal for organizations needing global SOC coverage (SOC is US-based only, analysts work remotely). Daylight Security is not ideal for risk-averse organizations requiring multi-year proven operational track record and independent reviews.