Barracuda Networks vs SentinelOne: MDR Comparison 2026
Barracuda Networks (MSP-channel) and SentinelOne (EDR vendor) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Barracuda Networks works with your existing tools, while SentinelOne requires its own security platform. Barracuda Networks targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; SentinelOne focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. Barracuda Networks includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for SentinelOne (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Barracuda Networks vs SentinelOne: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Barracuda Networks if:
- •MSPs needing a white-label/managed XDR for SMB clients
- •SMBs that don't have a security team and want turnkey coverage
- •Organizations using Microsoft 365 and needing email + endpoint coverage
- •You need SaaS and Network coverage included in base pricing
Choose SentinelOne if:
- •Organizations already running SentinelOne Singularity wanting platform-native MDR without adding another vendor
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting $1M breach response warranty as financial backstop
- •Organizations valuing AI-first detection with Purple AI and Google Threat Intelligence integration
- •Breach warranty matters to you (SentinelOne offers one, Barracuda Networks does not)
Bottom line: SentinelOne is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Barracuda Networks is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Barracuda Networks and SentinelOne?
Barracuda Networks is a MSP-channel that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SentinelOne is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Barracuda Networks covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for SentinelOne.
How do Barracuda Networks and SentinelOne differ in response capabilities?
Barracuda Networks supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. SentinelOne supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Barracuda Networks and not included with SentinelOne.
How does Barracuda Networks pricing compare to SentinelOne?
Barracuda Networks pricing: ~$14.50/endpoint/year (3-year endpoint); ~$8–$20/user/month depending on coverage scope. Minimum 25 licenses. (25-seat minimum). SentinelOne pricing: MDR add-on: ~$17-35/endpoint/year (standard) or ~$35-50/endpoint/year (Pro/Elite). Total: ~$197-280/endpoint/year for platform + MDR. Example: 1,000 endpoints x $35 MDR x 5 years = ~$175K MDR add-on cost.. Watch for with Barracuda Networks: Security logs not available for download — limits forensic independence; MSP-focused pricing may differ from direct enterprise pricing. Watch for with SentinelOne: Platform license ($69.99-$229.99/endpoint/year) is required BEFORE MDR — significant prerequisite cost; MDR pricing is a bolt-on fee separate from platform licensing — not shown on public pricing page.
Should I choose Barracuda Networks or SentinelOne?
Choose Barracuda Networks if: mSPs needing a white-label/managed XDR for SMB clients. Choose SentinelOne if: organizations already running SentinelOne Singularity wanting platform-native MDR without adding another vendor. Barracuda Networks is not ideal for enterprises wanting full data access and log export capabilities. SentinelOne is not ideal for organizations running CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, or any non-SentinelOne EDR — platform-native lock-in.