Tesorion vs Total Assure
Tesorion and Total Assure are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Tesorion targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Total Assure serves SMB and Mid-market. Tesorion includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for Total Assure (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Tesorion and Total Assure are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Tesorion targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Total Assure serves SMB and Mid-market. Tesorion includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for Total Assure (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Tesorion offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 3). Total Assure may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm | SMBs that want an outsourced security team with U.S.-based 24/7 SOC coverage |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Own agent required |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SMBs that want an outsourced security team with U.S.-based 24/7 SOC coverage
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Own agent required
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC | Total AssureTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry SentinelOne | SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Splunk |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom flat-rate pricing. No public dollar amount found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. | Flat-rate monthly pricing is claimed publicly, with no per-user fees and no hidden charges. Total Assure does not publish actual monthly price bands, minimums or what changes the flat rate as employees and infrastructure scale. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. | Confirm exactly which services are inside the flat monthly MDR rate, especially email security, vulnerability management, digital forensics and recovery.. Confirm whether Splunk, SentinelOne, Avanan, Tenable or other third-party tool costs are included or passed through.. The site claims no per-user surprises, but buyers should ask how the flat rate changes as employees, endpoints, cloud workloads and log volume grow.. No public contractual MDR SLA table, service-credit language or breach warranty was found. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Monthly, Custom |
| Channels | EmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. | Typical deployment reaches full 24/7 SOC protection by day 30 after discovery, deployment, configuration, tuning and baselining. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services | HealthcareFinancial ServicesManufacturingProfessional ServicesEducationDefense Industrial Base |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. | Public buyer-review signal is thin. G2 shows 5.0/5 from one review, says there are not enough reviews to provide buying insight, and categorizes the review under managed security services and vulnerability assessment rather than MDR specifically. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO | SOC 2 Type IIHIPAAISO 27001CMMCNIST |
| Certifications | ISO 27001NEN 7510 | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 |
| Founded | 2018 | 2023 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Tesorion and Total Assure?
Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Total Assure is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Total Assure.
How do Tesorion and Total Assure differ in response capabilities?
Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Total Assure supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Tesorion pricing compare to Total Assure?
Tesorion pricing: Not published. Total Assure pricing: Custom flat-rate pricing. No public dollar amount found.. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. Watch for with Total Assure: Confirm exactly which services are inside the flat monthly MDR rate, especially email security, vulnerability management, digital forensics and recovery.; Confirm whether Splunk, SentinelOne, Avanan, Tenable or other third-party tool costs are included or passed through..
Should I choose Tesorion or Total Assure?
Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Choose Total Assure if: sMBs that want an outsourced security team with U.S.-based 24/7 SOC coverage. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement. Total Assure is not ideal for enterprises needing published MDR benchmarks and formal public SLA terms before engaging sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.