Stoik vs Bitdefender MDR: MDR comparison 2026
Stoik is a Cyber insurer that requires its own security platform. Bitdefender MDR is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Stoik targets SMB organizations; Bitdefender MDR serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose Stoik if:
- •European SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle
- •Companies in France, Germany, Spain, Belgium, Austria or Luxembourg
- •Organizations needing affordable endpoint monitoring without complex procurement
Choose Bitdefender MDR if:
- •Organizations already on GravityZone wanting to add managed detection without changing their endpoint stack
- •MSPs looking for affordable, multi-tenant MDR with consumption billing and RMM integrations
- •Mid-market teams (50-500 endpoints) wanting single-vendor EPP + EDR + MDR from one provider
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Bitdefender MDR offers one, Stoik does not)
- •Threat hunting included in base pricing (it's an add-on with Stoik)
Bottom line: Stoik (Cyber insurer) and Bitdefender MDR (Platform vendor) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Stoik's stoik removes the friction of buying cyber insurance and mdr separately by bundling both for euro... or Bitdefender MDR's mitre-validated detection quality on a single-vendor gravityzone platform with 3 global socs and ....
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Stoik and Bitdefender MDR?
Stoik is a Cyber insurer that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Bitdefender MDR is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: Stoik offers Not disclosed, Bitdefender MDR offers ≤30 minutes.
How do Stoik and Bitdefender MDR differ in response capabilities?
Stoik supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Bitdefender MDR supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Stoik and not included with Bitdefender MDR.
How does Stoik pricing compare to Bitdefender MDR?
Stoik pricing: Not published. MDR is not priced separately from insurance.. Bitdefender MDR pricing: Not published. Bitdefender simplified to two tiers (MDR and MDR PLUS) in 2024. MSPs get consumption-based billing.. Watch for with Stoik: Requires CrowdStrike Falcon EDR deployment. Cannot use a competing endpoint agent.; MDR is only available bundled with a Stoik insurance policy. No standalone MDR purchase option.. Watch for with Bitdefender MDR: Requires GravityZone agent. Cannot use third-party EDR for core MDR detection.; XDR sensor licenses (network, identity, cloud, email) are additional cost and can significantly increase total spend.
Should I choose Stoik or Bitdefender MDR?
Choose Stoik if: european SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle. Choose Bitdefender MDR if: organizations already on GravityZone wanting to add managed detection without changing their endpoint stack. Stoik is not ideal for organizations needing active remediation or autonomous containment. Bitdefender MDR is not ideal for organizations with existing non-Bitdefender EDR they want to keep (requires GravityZone agent).