SecurityHQ vs Wirespeed
SecurityHQ is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. SecurityHQ targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. SecurityHQ includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
SecurityHQ is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. SecurityHQ targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. SecurityHQ includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
SecurityHQ (Services firm) and Wirespeed (Cyber insurer) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize SecurityHQ's the core draw is keeping your existing edr stack while adding soc analyst coverage, backed by a c... or Wirespeed's wirespeed is most interesting as an automated mdr layer for msps, lean security teams and coaliti....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance | MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Approval required | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | SecurityHQTECH-AGNOSTIC | WirespeedTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | None listed | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOnePalo Alto Networks CortexJamf ProtectCheck Point HarmonyHalcyon |
| SIEM integrations | IBM QRadar | Microsoft SentinelGeneric Syslog LogsGeneric JSON Logs |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateDisable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | ≤15 minutes | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, data volume and services required. Available through AWS Marketplace with private offers. | Custom pricing. Pricing page says Wirespeed works out pricing by organization and offers direct pricing for enterprises, partner pricing for MSP/MSSPs, and reseller/channel programs. |
| Hidden cost warnings | IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.. No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales.. Identity monitoring and SaaS coverage are scoped separately, which could increase costs significantly depending on your environment.. Multi-year contracts are typical in the MSSP market. Ask about early termination terms and auto-renewal clauses. | The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.. No public fixed price bands or minimums were found.. No public contractual response SLA or service-credit table was found.. Auto-containment is opt-in and is skipped for beta integrations, so buyers must confirm which integrations support automatic action.. This is an automation-heavy MDR model. Buyers expecting named SOC analysts or human-led threat hunting should validate service scope carefully. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | SlackTeamsEmailPortal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeMiddle EastNorth AmericaAPACAfrica | North America |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published as a standard timeline. Documentation says customers connect a user directory, detection source, communication channel and containment settings through API/OAuth integrations. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentTechnologyManufacturing | Cyber InsuranceManaged Service ProvidersTechnologyProfessional ServicesFinancial ServicesHealthcare |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published as MTTD. Coalition reports median time to verdict of 1,801 milliseconds. |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published as MTTR. Wirespeed says containment can happen in seconds when configured and supported by the integration. |
| Community view | Thin public review presence compared to larger MDR vendors. MITRE 2024 managed services evaluation showed strong detection with low alert noise. IDC MarketScape Leader for Middle East MDR in 2024 and 2025. Technology-agnostic approach appeals to customers with existing EDR investments, but no published pricing and few customer references make independent evaluation difficult. | Wirespeed is very new, so independent MDR review data is thin. Public differentiation is strong: automation-first MDR, broad integrations, MSP/MSSP positioning and Coalition's Active Insurance acquisition. The trade-off is limited third-party validation and open questions about post-acquisition packaging. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001CREST | SOC 2CMMC Level 2 support statement |
| Certifications | ISO 27001CREST SOC Accreditation | SOC 2 report available via Wirespeed Trust CenterSOC 2 attestation; CMMC support letter says Type I, while current site/trust materials should be checked for Type II status |
| Founded | 2003 | 2024 |
| Data retention | Not published. Varies by SIEM deployment and customer contract. | Pricing page lists 90 days of data lake retention. Long-term retention, export and Coalition data-sharing boundaries should be confirmed in contract. |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between SecurityHQ and Wirespeed?
SecurityHQ is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: SecurityHQ offers ≤15 minutes, Wirespeed offers Not disclosed. SecurityHQ covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Wirespeed.
How do SecurityHQ and Wirespeed differ in response capabilities?
SecurityHQ supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Wirespeed supports 3 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with SecurityHQ and not included with Wirespeed.
How does SecurityHQ pricing compare to Wirespeed?
SecurityHQ pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Wirespeed pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found.. Watch for with SecurityHQ: IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.; No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales.. Watch for with Wirespeed: The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.; No public fixed price bands or minimums were found..
Should I choose SecurityHQ or Wirespeed?
Choose SecurityHQ if: mid-market and enterprise organizations committed to existing EDR platforms who want SOC expertise without rip-and-replace. Choose Wirespeed if: mSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team. SecurityHQ is not ideal for teams wanting transparent pricing and published SLA credits upfront. Wirespeed is not ideal for buyers that require named analysts, scheduled threat hunts and human-led SOC review for every case.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.