SecurityHQ vs SISA ProACT
SecurityHQ and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. SecurityHQ targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. SecurityHQ includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Buyer brief
SecurityHQ and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. SecurityHQ targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. SecurityHQ includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
SecurityHQ offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 0). SISA ProACT may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance | Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Approval required | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | SecurityHQTECH-AGNOSTIC | SISA ProACTTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | None listed | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | IBM QRadar | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Disable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤15 minutes | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | Business hours |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, data volume and services required. Available through AWS Marketplace with private offers. | Custom quote. SISA does not publish ProACT MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.. No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales.. Identity monitoring and SaaS coverage are scoped separately, which could increase costs significantly depending on your environment.. Multi-year contracts are typical in the MSSP market. Ask about early termination terms and auto-renewal clauses. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. ProACT lists many stack components, including SIEM, EDR, CASB, UEBA, SOAR, threat hunting and dark web monitoring, so buyers should confirm which are included in the base quote.. Response automation is a major part of the pitch, so pre-approved SOAR actions and rollback rules should be documented before go-live.. DFIR and payment forensic services are adjacent SISA services, so buyers should confirm what investigation and response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, ProACT Agentic SOC, ProACT MXDR, DFIR Retainer Services |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | Portal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeMiddle EastNorth AmericaAPACAfrica | |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published. SISA says ProACT can use a customized and scalable stack with cloud and on-premise deployment options, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentTechnologyManufacturing | PaymentsFintechFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Thin public review presence compared to larger MDR vendors. MITRE 2024 managed services evaluation showed strong detection with low alert noise. IDC MarketScape Leader for Middle East MDR in 2024 and 2025. Technology-agnostic approach appeals to customers with existing EDR investments, but no published pricing and few customer references make independent evaluation difficult. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on SISA's payment-security focus, ProACT Agentic SOC, forensic intelligence, 1,000+ customer claim, 40+ country footprint and PCI forensic-investigation credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, SOC delivery model, response authority and non-payment use cases directly. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001CREST | PCI DSSPCI PINPCI 3DSPCI P2PEPCI S3PCI S-SLCPCI MPoCSWIFTGDPR |
| Certifications | ISO 27001CREST SOC Accreditation | PCI Global Payment Forensic InvestigatorPCI Qualified Security AssessorPCI-recognized laboratory for MPoC security evaluationsPCI GEAR committee member |
| Founded | 2003 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not published. Varies by SIEM deployment and customer contract. | SISA says ProACT supports PCI-compliant cloud deployments and on-premise options for data localization requirements, including custom Kubernetes and GCP environments. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between SecurityHQ and SISA ProACT?
SecurityHQ is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SISA ProACT is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: SecurityHQ offers ≤15 minutes, SISA ProACT offers Not disclosed. SecurityHQ covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for SISA ProACT.
How do SecurityHQ and SISA ProACT differ in response capabilities?
SecurityHQ supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. SISA ProACT supports 2 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with SecurityHQ and not included with SISA ProACT.
How does SecurityHQ pricing compare to SISA ProACT?
SecurityHQ pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. SISA ProACT pricing: Not published. Watch for with SecurityHQ: IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.; No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales.. Watch for with SISA ProACT: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment..
Should I choose SecurityHQ or SISA ProACT?
Choose SecurityHQ if: mid-market and enterprise organizations committed to existing EDR platforms who want SOC expertise without rip-and-replace. Choose SISA ProACT if: banks, payment processors, fintechs and payment ecosystem buyers that want MDR informed by forensic-investigation experience. SecurityHQ is not ideal for teams wanting transparent pricing and published SLA credits upfront. SISA ProACT is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.