SecurityHQ vs Arctic Wolf: MDR comparison 2026
SecurityHQ is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Arctic Wolf is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. SecurityHQ targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Arctic Wolf serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose SecurityHQ if:
- •Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance
- •Organizations requiring global SOC coverage across UK, Middle East, APAC and Africa
Choose Arctic Wolf if:
- •Mid-market organizations without a dedicated SOC that want a named security team, not just a monitoring service
- •IT teams managing multiple security tools that want a single pane of glass without replacing their existing stack
- •Organizations that value the industry's largest breach warranty ($3M) and compliance-aligned security reviews
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Arctic Wolf offers one, SecurityHQ does not)
Bottom line: SecurityHQ (Services firm) and Arctic Wolf (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize SecurityHQ's the core draw is keeping your existing edr stack while adding soc analyst coverage, backed by a c... or Arctic Wolf's the concierge security team model is arctic wolf's core differentiator: a named team that knows y....
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between SecurityHQ and Arctic Wolf?
SecurityHQ is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Arctic Wolf is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: SecurityHQ offers ≤15 minutes, Arctic Wolf offers ≤1 hour.
How do SecurityHQ and Arctic Wolf differ in response capabilities?
SecurityHQ supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Arctic Wolf supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment, account disable) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with SecurityHQ and not included with Arctic Wolf.
How does SecurityHQ pricing compare to Arctic Wolf?
SecurityHQ pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Arctic Wolf pricing: MDR Basic starts at $44,000/year for up to 100 users (AWS Marketplace). Median buyer-reported deal is $96,340/year based on 17 purchases (Vendr). Range: $29,176 to $319,984/year depending on scope.. Watch for with SecurityHQ: IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.; No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales.. Watch for with Arctic Wolf: Remediation is guided, not performed on your behalf. May need a separate IR retainer for hands-on incident response.; Normalized data and threat feeds are not directly accessible. You get dashboards and reports, not raw data..
Should I choose SecurityHQ or Arctic Wolf?
Choose SecurityHQ if: mid-market and enterprise organizations committed to existing EDR platforms who want SOC expertise without rip-and-replace. Choose Arctic Wolf if: mid-market organizations without a dedicated SOC that want a named security team, not just a monitoring service. SecurityHQ is not ideal for teams wanting transparent pricing and published SLA credits upfront. Arctic Wolf is not ideal for security teams that want direct access to raw telemetry, custom detection engineering, or SIEM query capabilities.