Sattrix vs SecurityHQ
Sattrix and SecurityHQ are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Sattrix targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while SecurityHQ serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Sattrix includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 3 for SecurityHQ (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Sattrix and SecurityHQ are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Sattrix targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while SecurityHQ serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Sattrix includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 3 for SecurityHQ (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
SecurityHQ offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 2). Sattrix may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider | Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Companies with experienced IT teams who can execute remediation actions based on analyst guidance
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | SattrixTECH-AGNOSTIC | SecurityHQTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer EDR | None listed |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM | IBM QRadar |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | ≤15 minutes |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Sattrix says managed SOC pricing can vary by needs, monitored assets and service level, but does not publish package prices. | Custom pricing based on environment size, data volume and services required. Available through AWS Marketplace with private offers. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage.. The MDR page refers to SIEM, EDR and endpoint-protection integrations, so buyers should confirm who owns each tool license.. SOC, SOAR, vulnerability management and incident response are adjacent service lines, so buyers should document what is included in MDR.. Public pages do not publish a standard onboarding duration or log-retention period. | IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.. No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales.. Identity monitoring and SaaS coverage are scoped separately, which could increase costs significantly depending on your environment.. Multi-year contracts are typical in the MSSP market. Ask about early termination terms and auto-renewal clauses. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, MDR Services, SOC as a Service, SOAR as a Service, Hybrid SOC Management | Annual |
| Channels | EmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | APAC | EuropeMiddle EastNorth AmericaAPACAfrica |
| Onboarding | Not published. Sattrix says MDR integrates with existing security tools such as SIEM, EDR and endpoint protection, but no standard onboarding duration was found. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetailGovernmentTechnologyManufacturingEducation | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentTechnologyManufacturing |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Sattrix publishes Gartner-linked MDR testimonials on its own about and partnership pages, including comments about SOC services, 24/7 monitoring and remote response. No broad independent public MDR review signal was found during this pass, so buyers should validate delivery model, pricing, response authority and tool ownership directly. | Thin public review presence compared to larger MDR vendors. MITRE 2024 managed services evaluation showed strong detection with low alert noise. IDC MarketScape Leader for Middle East MDR in 2024 and 2025. Technology-agnostic approach appeals to customers with existing EDR investments, but no published pricing and few customer references make independent evaluation difficult. |
| Compliance | PCI DSSHIPAAGDPRCCPA | ISO 27001CREST |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001ISO 9001:2015ISO 27001:2013Startup India DIPP recognition | ISO 27001CREST SOC Accreditation |
| Founded | 2013 | 2003 |
| Data retention | Sattrix discusses compliance reporting, log monitoring and privacy mandates, but no standard public MDR data-retention period was found. | Not published. Varies by SIEM deployment and customer contract. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Sattrix and SecurityHQ?
Sattrix is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SecurityHQ is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Sattrix offers Not disclosed, SecurityHQ offers ≤15 minutes. Sattrix covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for SecurityHQ.
How do Sattrix and SecurityHQ differ in response capabilities?
Sattrix supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. SecurityHQ supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting.
How does Sattrix pricing compare to SecurityHQ?
Sattrix pricing: Not published. SecurityHQ pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Sattrix: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage.. Watch for with SecurityHQ: IBM QRadar SIEM licensing may be a separate cost depending on whether SecurityHQ hosts it or you bring your own. Clarify who pays for SIEM infrastructure.; No published pricing at all. AWS Marketplace lists private offers only, so you will not see a price until you engage sales..
Should I choose Sattrix or SecurityHQ?
Choose Sattrix if: india, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider. Choose SecurityHQ if: mid-market and enterprise organizations committed to existing EDR platforms who want SOC expertise without rip-and-replace. Sattrix is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. SecurityHQ is not ideal for teams wanting transparent pricing and published SLA credits upfront.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.