Recon InfoSec vs Tesorion
Recon InfoSec is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Recon InfoSec targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Recon InfoSec includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Recon InfoSec is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Recon InfoSec targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Recon InfoSec includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Recon InfoSec (Pure-play MDR) and Tesorion (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Recon InfoSec's recon infosec is a strong fit for buyers who want managed security operations with broad integrat... or Tesorion's tesorion mdr fits dutch buyers that want local mdr delivered through t-soc and backed by t-cert, ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations that want MDR across existing endpoint, SIEM, cloud, identity, network and email tools | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations that want MDR across existing endpoint, SIEM, cloud, identity, network and email tools
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Recon InfoSecTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | LimaCharlieCrowdStrikeMicrosoft DefenderCarbon BlackBitdefender GravityZoneBlackBerry CylanceSophosTrend MicroSymantecQualys EDRRSA NetWitness EDR SentinelOne | Customer endpoint telemetry SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkSumo LogicStellar CyberAlienVaultArcSightGoogle ChronicleDevoElasticExabeamFortiSIEMIBM QRadarLogPointLogRhythmLogz.ioRapid7 InsightIDRRSA NetWitness | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. No public price bands, per-user pricing or minimums found. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Recon MDR appears closer to full managed security operations than a narrow endpoint-only MDR SKU, so buyers should confirm the modules included in the quoted scope.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found.. Default autonomous response actions are not published. Confirm which actions Recon can take without approval.. Physical SOC locations, analyst count and raw data export terms are not public. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | |
| Onboarding | Not published as a standard timeline. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareOil and GasManufacturingUtilitiesGovernmentEducationConstructionRetail | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Recon publishes a +97 NPS claim, customer testimonials, logos and public practitioner/community signals around OpenSOC, SOC X and Thursday Defensive. Independent third-party review volume is limited: no meaningful G2 or Gartner MDR review profile was found in this pass. Public community signal is sparse, so buyer validation should lean on references and proof-of-value work. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | AICPA SOC 2 Type IITIPS Awarded VendorTexas DIR Approved Vendor | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Recon InfoSec and Tesorion?
Recon InfoSec is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Recon InfoSec covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do Recon InfoSec and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Recon InfoSec supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Recon InfoSec and not included with Tesorion.
How does Recon InfoSec pricing compare to Tesorion?
Recon InfoSec pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Recon InfoSec: Recon MDR appears closer to full managed security operations than a narrow endpoint-only MDR SKU, so buyers should confirm the modules included in the quoted scope.; No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found.. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Recon InfoSec or Tesorion?
Choose Recon InfoSec if: organizations that want MDR across existing endpoint, SIEM, cloud, identity, network and email tools. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Recon InfoSec is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing before engaging sales. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.