Pondurance vs Tesorion
Pondurance is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Pondurance targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Pondurance includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Pondurance is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Pondurance targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Pondurance includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Pondurance (Pure-play MDR) and Tesorion (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Pondurance's affordable, technology-agnostic mdr for us mid-market buyers in regulated industries, with a risk... or Tesorion's tesorion mdr fits dutch buyers that want local mdr delivered through t-soc and backed by t-cert, ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations that want a $2M breach warranty and HITRUST readiness consulting from one vendor | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | $2,000,000 | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations that want a $2M breach warranty and HITRUST readiness consulting from one vendor
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- $2,000,000
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | PonduranceTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender SentinelOne | Customer endpoint telemetry SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Custom quotes only. Reviews describe pricing as affordable relative to competitors. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | $2,000,000 | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint for endpoint MDR. Network MDR priced by bandwidth. Log MDR priced by GB/day ingestion. Custom quotes. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Separate retainer required for the 2-hour response commitment.. Network MDR, Log MDR, and Pondurance for Microsoft are all separate products with separate pricing on top of endpoint MDR. RansomSnare module is a separate license on top of MDR (free promotion for new customers may be time-limited). Cloud, SaaS (M365), and network coverage each require purchasing separate product modules beyond base endpoint MDR | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Reviews describe setup as straightforward. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesGovernmentEducationManufacturingRetail | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Under 15 minutes (vendor marketing claim, described as 'typical time to remediation') | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 5.0/5 but only 2 reviews, too small to draw conclusions. Named in Gartner 2024 Market Guide for MDR as the only 'risk-based' vendor. Almost no presence on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit. Glassdoor 2.4/5 (36 reviews) with recurring complaints about leadership and employee turnover. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | – | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | Certified Common Security Framework Practitioners (CCSFP) on staff | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2008 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Pondurance and Tesorion?
Pondurance is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Pondurance covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do Pondurance and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Pondurance supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Pondurance pricing compare to Tesorion?
Pondurance pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only. Reviews describe pricing as affordable relative to competitors.. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Pondurance: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Separate retainer required for the 2-hour response commitment.; Network MDR, Log MDR, and Pondurance for Microsoft are all separate products with separate pricing on top of endpoint MDR. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Pondurance or Tesorion?
Choose Pondurance if: uS mid-market organizations in healthcare, financial services, or government wanting affordable MDR for regulated environments. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Pondurance is not ideal for international organizations needing non-US SOC coverage or multilingual support. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.