Performanta vs Stoik
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Stoik is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Stoik serves SMB. Performanta includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity), compared to 1 for Stoik (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Stoik is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Stoik serves SMB. Performanta includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity), compared to 1 for Stoik (Endpoint).
Performanta (Services firm) and Stoik (Cyber insurer) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-... or Stoik's stoik removes the friction of buying cyber insurance and mdr separately by bundling both for euro....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response | European SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC | StoikTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrike |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Not coveredIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Not coveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. MDR is not priced separately from insurance. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Identity | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Network | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. | Bundled annual pricing combining cyber insurance and MDR. Price varies by company size, revenue, sector and coverage tier. Sold through 2,000+ broker partners only. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. | Requires CrowdStrike Falcon EDR deployment. Cannot use a competing endpoint agent.. MDR is only available bundled with a Stoik insurance policy. No standalone MDR purchase option.. Sold through broker partners only. No direct purchase from Stoik.. Revenue cap: companies up to 1B EUR turnover (expanded from 750M EUR after CyberContract acquisition in September 2025). |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAfrica | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. | CrowdStrike Falcon agent deployment, no minimum endpoint requirement published |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism | Professional ServicesRetailManufacturingTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. | Almost no English-language reviews. 10,000+ insured companies and 200%+ YoY growth show market traction in continental Europe. Backed by a16z, Munich Re Ventures and Alven (~$78M raised through Series C in Jan 2026). Practitioner sentiment on MDR quality is impossible to gauge from public sources. |
| Compliance | – | GDPR |
| Certifications | – | – |
| Founded | 2010 | 2021 |
| Data retention | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Performanta and Stoik?
Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Stoik is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for Stoik.
How do Performanta and Stoik differ in response capabilities?
Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Stoik supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Incident response is not included with Performanta and included with Stoik.
How does Performanta pricing compare to Stoik?
Performanta pricing: Not published. Stoik pricing: Not published. MDR is not priced separately from insurance.. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Watch for with Stoik: Requires CrowdStrike Falcon EDR deployment. Cannot use a competing endpoint agent.; MDR is only available bundled with a Stoik insurance policy. No standalone MDR purchase option..
Should I choose Performanta or Stoik?
Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. Choose Stoik if: european SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Stoik is not ideal for organizations needing active remediation or autonomous containment.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.