Performanta vs Smarttech247
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Smarttech247 is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Smarttech247 serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Performanta includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity), compared to 5 for Smarttech247 (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Smarttech247 is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Smarttech247 serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Performanta includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity), compared to 5 for Smarttech247 (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Performanta (Services firm) and Smarttech247 (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-... or Smarttech247's technology-agnostic mdr that works with your existing siem and edr, with 100% mdr client retentio....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response | European mid-market organizations with existing SIEM and EDR investments that want MDR layered on top |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European mid-market organizations with existing SIEM and EDR investments that want MDR layered on top
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC | Smarttech247TECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrikeSentinelOnePalo Alto CortexTrend MicroTrellix Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | SplunkIBM QRadarGoogle ChronicleExabeamLogRhythm Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. | Not published. Custom quotes only. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. | No pricing published anywhere, requires full sales engagement for any quote. ThreatHub and NoPhish are separate products with separate licensing on top of VisionX MDR. OT/ICS monitoring is an add-on, not included in base MDR. Strategic SentinelOne partnership may affect pricing or bundling for non-SentinelOne customers |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | EuropeAfrica | EuropeNorth America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. | 5-10 business days (vendor claim) |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism | HealthcareFinancial ServicesGovernmentPharmaceuticalManufacturingEnergy |
| MTTD | Not published | Under 5 minutes (vendor-published, not independently validated) |
| MTTR | Not published | Under 15 minutes (vendor-published, not independently validated) |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. | Gartner Peer Insights 4.6/5 (13 reviews). Named in Gartner Market Guide for MDR in 2024 and 2025. Glassdoor 4.0/5 (41 reviews, 72% recommend). 100% MDR client retention in FY2024 per annual report. No G2 or PeerSpot presence. No Reddit discussions found. |
| Compliance | – | ISO 9001:2015ISO 27001Cyber Essentials |
| Certifications | – | ISO 9001:2015ISO 27001Cyber EssentialsNSAI Certified |
| Founded | 2010 | 2008 |
| Data retention | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Performanta and Smarttech247?
Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Smarttech247 is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Smarttech247.
How do Performanta and Smarttech247 differ in response capabilities?
Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Smarttech247 supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Performanta and included with Smarttech247.
How does Performanta pricing compare to Smarttech247?
Performanta pricing: Not published. Smarttech247 pricing: Not published. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Watch for with Smarttech247: No pricing published anywhere, requires full sales engagement for any quote; ThreatHub and NoPhish are separate products with separate licensing on top of VisionX MDR.
Should I choose Performanta or Smarttech247?
Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. Choose Smarttech247 if: european mid-market organizations with existing SIEM and EDR investments that want MDR layered on top. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Smarttech247 is not ideal for buyers wanting transparent pricing before engaging sales (nothing is published).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.