Obrela vs Performanta
Obrela and Performanta are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Obrela targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Obrela includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
Buyer brief
Obrela and Performanta are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Obrela targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Obrela includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
Obrela offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 2). Performanta may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European or MENA organizations wanting local SOC presence and data residency | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European or MENA organizations wanting local SOC presence and data residency
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | ObrelaTECH-AGNOSTIC | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Custom quotes only. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤15 minutes | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. Four tiers: MDR Core Lite, Core Plus, CoreX Max, and CoreX Elite, with increasing detection content and hunting capabilities. Specialized modules (OT, Vessels, Brand) priced separately. | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Threat hunting is an add-on at every tier, not included in base MDR. Four-tier model (Core Lite through CoreX Elite) with feature boundaries not publicly documented. OT, Vessels, and Brand modules each carry separate pricing on top of base MDR. Core and CoreX tiers are built around Microsoft Defender XDR and Sentinel, which may require Microsoft licensing you do not already own. Cloud workload monitoring currently supports only Microsoft Azure. AWS and GCP support is listed as 'future' on their website | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Not published | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeMEA | EuropeAfrica |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareMaritimeEnergyManufacturingTelecommunications | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Under 15 minutes (vendor-published). Obrela's website claims 11.2-minute average for critical incidents, but this is self-reported, not independently validated. | Not published |
| Community view | Named in the Gartner Market Guide for MDR four times (2021, 2023, 2024, 2025) and included in Forrester Wave MDR Services Europe Q3 2025. Virtually no customer reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit. Glassdoor 3.7/5 (52 reviews, 63% recommend). Strong analyst recognition but almost no independent customer validation. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001:2013ISO 9001:2015ISO 22301:2019CRESTNCSC CIR Level 2Cyber EssentialsDESC (Dubai) | – |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2013ISO 9001:2015ISO 22301:2019CREST CertifiedNCSC CIR Level 2 Assured Service ProviderCyber EssentialsDESC Accreditation (Dubai)Microsoft MISA MemberTeleTrusT IT Security Made in EU | – |
| Founded | 2010 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Obrela and Performanta?
Obrela is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Obrela offers ≤15 minutes, Performanta offers Not disclosed. Obrela covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Performanta.
How do Obrela and Performanta differ in response capabilities?
Obrela supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Obrela and not included with Performanta.
How does Obrela pricing compare to Performanta?
Obrela pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. Performanta pricing: Not published. Watch for with Obrela: Threat hunting is an add-on at every tier, not included in base MDR; Four-tier model (Core Lite through CoreX Elite) with feature boundaries not publicly documented. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost..
Should I choose Obrela or Performanta?
Choose Obrela if: european or MENA organizations wanting local SOC presence and data residency. Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. Obrela is not ideal for north American or APAC organizations needing local SOC presence. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.