NVISO vs Tesorion
NVISO and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. NVISO targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. NVISO includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
NVISO and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. NVISO targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. NVISO includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Tesorion offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 3). NVISO may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European mid-market and enterprise buyers that want MDR delivered from a European cybersecurity firm | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European mid-market and enterprise buyers that want MDR delivered from a European cybersecurity firm
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | NVISOTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Palo Alto CortexMicrosoft Defender SentinelOne | Customer endpoint telemetry SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelElastic | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on managed service scope, telemetry sources, portal and ITSM integration, detection analytics, threat hunting, incident response support and platform choices such as Cortex, SentinelOne or Microsoft tooling. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No public price floor or package table was found.. The service is technology-agnostic, but buyers choosing Cortex or Microsoft tooling should price platform licensing separately.. NVISO CSIRT support backs the MDR service, but buyers should confirm which DFIR hours are included and what requires a separate retainer.. The portal exposes SLA status, but public materials do not publish fixed response-time terms or service credits.. No public breach warranty or trial was found. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Scope depends on telemetry sources, ITSM integration, platform choices and whether NVISO runs a dedicated, co-managed or outsourced operational model. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesTechnologyGovernmentManufacturingAerospaceCritical Infrastructure | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | NVISO has credible European security-operations and incident-response evidence, including MITRE managed-services participation and public customer references, but public MDR-specific peer review volume is limited. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001GDPR | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | ISO 27001SOC 2 attestation, type not publishedSOC-CMM Gold PartnerPalo Alto Networks Cortex XMDR SpecializationMicrosoft Intelligent Security Association memberMicrosoft Security Solutions Partner | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2013 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published for MDR. Retention depends on the customer's monitoring platforms and contract scope. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between NVISO and Tesorion?
NVISO is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NVISO covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do NVISO and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
NVISO supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does NVISO pricing compare to Tesorion?
NVISO pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with NVISO: No public price floor or package table was found.; The service is technology-agnostic, but buyers choosing Cortex or Microsoft tooling should price platform licensing separately.. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose NVISO or Tesorion?
Choose NVISO if: european mid-market and enterprise buyers that want MDR delivered from a European cybersecurity firm. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. NVISO is not ideal for buyers needing public per-endpoint pricing before a sales call. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.