Nomios vs Tesorion
Nomios and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Nomios targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Nomios and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Nomios targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Both providers target similar markets. Compare their specific response actions, communication channels, and pricing structure to find the better fit for your environment.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European buyers that need EU-hosted MDR data and a local SOC relationship | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European buyers that need EU-hosted MDR data and a local SOC relationship
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | NomiosTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDRCrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender for EndpointCustomer EDR through Custom MDR | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Nomios Sovereign Managed SIEMMicrosoft SentinelSplunkIBM QRadarPalo Alto Networks XSIAM | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Tiered Guardian xMDR pricing and custom pricing for tailored MDR. Public materials state Guardian xMDR has Essential, Core, Advanced and Elite tiers, with scoping starting from endpoint count and expanding by coverage needs. Public price amounts are not listed. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Nomios says Guardian xMDR has transparent tier-based pricing, but public price amounts are not listed.. Guardian xMDR is built on Cortex XDR, so buyers should price Palo Alto licensing and migration effort if they are not already on that stack.. Coverage outside Cortex XDR's native library may require the Sovereign Managed SIEM extension.. Custom MDR can keep existing tools, but SIEM, EDR and data-retention costs remain part of total cost.. No public breach warranty, trial or fixed response-time SLA was found. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Subscription, Custom | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Guardian xMDR is positioned as structured and fast to deploy; Custom MDR is scoped through direct engagement based on existing tools and required detection engineering. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareManufacturingFinancial ServicesGovernmentRetailTechnology | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Nomios has a European infrastructure and security-services footprint, but public MDR-specific peer review volume is limited. The clearest public evidence is from Nomios' own MDR page and Guardian xMDR launch material rather than independent managed-service evaluations. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IIGDPRNIS2DORA | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | ISO 27001SOC 2 Type II | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2004 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published as a fixed MDR retention period. Nomios states Guardian xMDR customer data is hosted within the EU; retention should be confirmed by tier and SIEM scope. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Nomios and Tesorion?
Nomios is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Nomios and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Nomios supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Nomios pricing compare to Tesorion?
Nomios pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Nomios: Nomios says Guardian xMDR has transparent tier-based pricing, but public price amounts are not listed.; Guardian xMDR is built on Cortex XDR, so buyers should price Palo Alto licensing and migration effort if they are not already on that stack.. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Nomios or Tesorion?
Choose Nomios if: european buyers that need EU-hosted MDR data and a local SOC relationship. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Nomios is not ideal for buyers that need public per-endpoint price amounts before a sales call. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.