NCC Group vs BlueVoyant: MDR comparison 2026
NCC Group is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. NCC Group targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; BlueVoyant serves Mid-market and Enterprise. NCC Group includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 3 for BlueVoyant (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity).
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose NCC Group if:
- •European enterprise and government organizations running Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk as their SIEM
- •Buyers wanting MDR from a provider with deep incident response and consulting capability in one firm
- •UK and Benelux organizations wanting a locally operated SOC with Dutch government security heritage
- •You need SaaS and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •Threat hunting included in base pricing (it's an add-on with BlueVoyant)
Choose BlueVoyant if:
- •Organizations that want all detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own SIEM instance
- •Splunk Enterprise or Splunk Cloud customers needing managed detection and response
Bottom line: NCC Group (Services firm) and BlueVoyant (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize NCC Group's consultancy-backed mxdr with fox-it's 20+ year soc heritage and embedded ir team or BlueVoyant's the strongest microsoft sentinel mdr option for organizations that want their detection rules, pl....
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between NCC Group and BlueVoyant?
NCC Group is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NCC Group covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for BlueVoyant.
How do NCC Group and BlueVoyant differ in response capabilities?
NCC Group supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. BlueVoyant supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with NCC Group and not included with BlueVoyant.
How does NCC Group pricing compare to BlueVoyant?
NCC Group pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. BlueVoyant pricing: Not published. Contact for custom quote.. Watch for with NCC Group: MXDR for Microsoft and MXDR for Splunk are separate offerings. Customers using both Sentinel and Splunk may face separate engagements.; Only Microsoft Defender and CrowdStrike EDR integrations are confirmed. Other EDR platforms may not be supported.. Watch for with BlueVoyant: Threat hunting is not included in base MDR. Advanced Threat Hunting and Cross Signal Hunting are add-on tiers with separate pricing; Coverage varies significantly by which MDR track you buy (Microsoft, Splunk, Cisco XDR, Endpoint). Identity and SaaS coverage may only be available in the Microsoft track.
Should I choose NCC Group or BlueVoyant?
Choose NCC Group if: european enterprise and government organizations running Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk as their SIEM. Choose BlueVoyant if: mid-market and enterprise organizations already invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender wanting MDR without a proprietary agent. NCC Group is not ideal for organizations running a SIEM other than Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk (only two supported). BlueVoyant is not ideal for organizations needing broad multi-vendor integration support. BlueVoyant supports four EDR platforms and two SIEMs, far fewer than competitors like Expel or eSentire.