mnemonic vs Tesorion
mnemonic and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. mnemonic targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. mnemonic includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
mnemonic and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. mnemonic targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. mnemonic includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Tesorion offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 3). mnemonic may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a Nordic MDR provider | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a Nordic MDR provider
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | mnemonicTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft DefenderArgus Endpoint Responder | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Argus MDR platformMicrosoft Sentinel | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on service plan, telemetry scope, Microsoft, CrowdStrike, Wiz, Zscaler or third-party technology used, and any custom playbooks, reporting or account management. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No public MDR price floor or tier table was found.. Argus MDR is modular, so buyers should confirm which telemetry areas and plan tier are included in the base quote.. Endpoint isolation depends on Argus Endpoint Responder and the selected endpoint stack.. The Wiz service uses O3 Cyber optionally for posture improvement, so confirm whether that work is included.. No public fixed response-time SLA, breach warranty or trial was found. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Scope depends on the selected service plan, Microsoft, CrowdStrike, Wiz, network and OT telemetry, and whether custom playbooks or account management are included. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesGovernmentCritical InfrastructureTechnologyManufacturing | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | mnemonic has long-running European MDR, incident-response and threat-intelligence evidence, but public MDR-specific peer review volume is limited. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001GDPR | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2022ISO 9001:2015ISO 14001:2015SOC 2, type not publishedEco-LighthouseMicrosoft Cloud Security advanced specializationMicrosoft Threat Protection advanced specializationWiz Integration Network member | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2000 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published for MDR. Retention depends on the selected Argus modules, customer telemetry sources and deployment model. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between mnemonic and Tesorion?
mnemonic is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). mnemonic covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do mnemonic and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
mnemonic supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with mnemonic and not included with Tesorion.
How does mnemonic pricing compare to Tesorion?
mnemonic pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with mnemonic: No public MDR price floor or tier table was found.; Argus MDR is modular, so buyers should confirm which telemetry areas and plan tier are included in the base quote.. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose mnemonic or Tesorion?
Choose mnemonic if: european mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a Nordic MDR provider. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. mnemonic is not ideal for sMBs looking for public per-endpoint pricing. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.