Mandiant vs Todyl: MDR Comparison 2026
Mandiant (Services firm) and Todyl (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Mandiant works with your existing tools, while Todyl requires its own security platform. Mandiant targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Todyl focuses on SMB and Mid-market.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Mandiant vs Todyl: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Mandiant if:
- •Enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations
- •Google Cloud Platform customers wanting native SecOps integration
- •Organizations facing nation-state or advanced persistent threats where Mandiant's frontline IR experience is critical
Choose Todyl if:
- •MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform with multi-tenant management
- •SMBs with lean security teams wanting a dedicated security contact (DRAM) at an accessible price point
- •Greenfield deployments with no existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments to preserve
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: Todyl is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Mandiant is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Mandiant and Todyl?
Mandiant is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Todyl is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack).
How do Mandiant and Todyl differ in response capabilities?
Mandiant supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Todyl supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Mandiant pricing compare to Todyl?
Mandiant pricing: Estimated ~$83,000/year (third-party estimate from Vendr, not officially published).. Todyl pricing: Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published.. Watch for with Mandiant: ~$83K+/year estimated — premium enterprise pricing; IR retainer is separate — must be purchased independently for full incident response. Watch for with Todyl: Platform-native lock-in -- must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE; $250/month starting price is the base -- unclear what modules are included at that tier.
Should I choose Mandiant or Todyl?
Choose Mandiant if: enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations. Choose Todyl if: mSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform with multi-tenant management. Mandiant is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations — ~$83K+/year estimated pricing. Todyl is not ideal for organizations with existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments -- requires full Todyl stack adoption.