Macnica vs Todyl
Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Todyl is a MSP-channel that requires its own security platform. Macnica targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Todyl serves SMB and Mid-market. Macnica includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 5 for Todyl (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Todyl is a MSP-channel that requires its own security platform. Macnica targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Todyl serves SMB and Mid-market. Macnica includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 5 for Todyl (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Todyl is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Macnica is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting | MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform |
| Price | Custom quote | Base platform from $250/mo; MXDR pricing unpublished |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform
- Price
- Base platform from $250/mo; MXDR pricing unpublished
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC | TodylPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike FalconTrellix EDRCustomer EDR tools | Todyl Endpoint Security (native, required, Elastic-based) |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM and log platforms | Todyl Cloud-Managed SIEM (native) |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. | Three-tier packaging (Essentials, Advanced, Complete) launched September 2025. Platform subscription starting at $250/month. Per-tier pricing not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. | Platform-native lock-in, must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE. $250/month starting price is the base, unclear what modules are included at that tier. EDR is Elastic-based, not Todyl proprietary, custom rules layer on top of Elastic |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement | Annual |
| Channels | EmailPhone | SlackTeamsPortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | APAC | North America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications | MSP/ChannelHealthcareGovernmentEducationFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. | G2 4.6/5 (93 reviews). Software Finder 4.9/5 (14 reviews). PeerSpot listed but minimal reviews. MSP press is positive about tool consolidation. Limited independent buyer validation compared to established MDR vendors. |
| Compliance | – | SOC 2 (infrastructure providers, not Todyl directly)ISO 27001 (infrastructure providers, not Todyl directly) |
| Certifications | – | – |
| Founded | – | 2015 |
| Data retention | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. | Up to 5 years searchable SIEM storage (configurable by tier) |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Macnica and Todyl?
Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Todyl is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Macnica covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Todyl.
How do Macnica and Todyl differ in response capabilities?
Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Todyl supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Macnica pricing compare to Todyl?
Macnica pricing: Not published. Todyl pricing: Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published.. Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Watch for with Todyl: Platform-native lock-in, must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE; $250/month starting price is the base, unclear what modules are included at that tier.
Should I choose Macnica or Todyl?
Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. Choose Todyl if: mSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform. Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement. Todyl is not ideal for organizations with existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments (requires full Todyl stack adoption).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.