Macnica vs Rapid7
Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Rapid7 is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Macnica targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Rapid7 serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Macnica includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 5 for Rapid7 (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Rapid7 is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Macnica targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Rapid7 serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Macnica includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 5 for Rapid7 (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Rapid7 is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Macnica is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting | Mid-market to enterprise organizations (500+ assets) wanting full SIEM data transparency alongside MDR |
| Price | Custom quote | Est from ~$17/asset/mo, 500-asset min |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | $1,000,000 |
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market to enterprise organizations (500+ assets) wanting full SIEM data transparency alongside MDR
- Price
- Est from ~$17/asset/mo, 500-asset min
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- $1,000,000
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC | Rapid7PLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike FalconTrellix EDRCustomer EDR tools | Rapid7 Insight AgentCarbon BlackCisco Secure EndpointCrowdStrikeMicrosoft DefenderSentinelOnePalo Alto CortexCybereasonTrend Micro |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM and log platforms | InsightIDR |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Third-party estimate: starting ~$17/asset/month. Mid-market deployments typically $60K-$80K/year. Enterprise $150K+/year. |
| Minimum seats | None | 500 |
| Breach warranty | – | $1,000,000 |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. | Per-asset monthly pricing. Three tiers: Essential, Advanced, Ultimate. Managed Threat Complete (MTC) bundles MDR + SIEM + VM + SOAR. MDR Elite available as standalone MDR service. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. | Requires Rapid7 Insight Agent on 80%+ of supported assets, minimum 500 assets. Breach warranty and unlimited DFIR only available on Ultimate tier. Essential tier has no dedicated cybersecurity advisors (Support Center only). Custom event sources and custom detections only on Advanced/Ultimate tiers |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | EmailPhone | SlackEmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | APAC | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. | Weeks, varies by environment size and Insight Agent deployment scope |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications | ManufacturingHealthcareFinancial ServicesTechnologyRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | No absolute MTTD published. Comparative claim: 63% faster than in-house SOC teams. |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. | PeerSpot 8.6/10 (MDR). Gartner SIEM MQ recognized 7th year (2025). MITRE 2023: all 19 Turla attack phases detected. Praised for data transparency and analyst pod familiarity. Company underwent 18% layoffs in Aug 2023, explored PE sale in Q4 2024 (no deal), Jana Partners activist investor added 3 board seats in 2025. Revenue $860M (FY2025), guidance for 2026 slightly lower ($835-843M). |
| Compliance | – | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRCyber Essentials PlusFedRAMP Moderate (InsightGovCloud) |
| Certifications | – | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusFedRAMP Moderate (InsightGovCloud Platform) |
| Founded | – | 2000 |
| Data retention | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. | 13 months |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Macnica and Rapid7?
Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Rapid7 is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Macnica covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Rapid7.
How do Macnica and Rapid7 differ in response capabilities?
Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Rapid7 supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Macnica and included with Rapid7.
How does Macnica pricing compare to Rapid7?
Macnica pricing: Not published. Rapid7 pricing: Third-party estimate: starting ~$17/asset/month. Mid-market deployments typically $60K-$80K/year. Enterprise $150K+/year. (500-seat minimum). Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Watch for with Rapid7: Requires Rapid7 Insight Agent on 80%+ of supported assets, minimum 500 assets; Breach warranty and unlimited DFIR only available on Ultimate tier.
Should I choose Macnica or Rapid7?
Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. Choose Rapid7 if: mid-market to enterprise organizations (500+ assets) wanting full SIEM data transparency alongside MDR. Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement. Rapid7 is not ideal for organizations with fewer than 500 assets (minimum requirement).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.