Lumifi vs Tesorion
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Lumifi targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Lumifi includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Lumifi targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Lumifi includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Lumifi (Pure-play MDR) and Tesorion (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Lumifi's pe-backed mdr roll-up with healthcare specialization, ex-military soc personnel, and a technology... or Tesorion's tesorion mdr fits dutch buyers that want local mdr delivered through t-soc and backed by t-cert, ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR, especially those already in the Critical Insight customer base | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR, especially those already in the Critical Insight customer base
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | LumifiTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOne Singularity XDRCrowdStrike FalconVMware Carbon BlackPalo Alto Cortex XDR | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelExabeamElasticStellar CyberNetWitnessEventTracker (Netsurion platform) | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, coverage areas, and platform integrations. No public pricing information available. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate service from the Critical Insight division, likely priced separately.. OT/ICS coverage requires the NetWitness partnership (announced Feb 2026) and is not part of standard MDR. Pricing and maturity of this offering are unknown.. Roll-up strategy means the service you buy today may have been three different companies 13 months ago. Ask about integration status between Datashield, Netsurion, and Critical Insight operations.. Zero public pricing. No way to benchmark costs before a sales conversation.. Single US SOC in Scottsdale, AZ. No follow-the-sun coverage, which may affect overnight response quality. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | Europe |
| Onboarding | Varies by integration complexity. API-based integrations for Microsoft Sentinel, Defender, and SentinelOne can take days to weeks. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareCritical InfrastructureEnergyManufacturingFinancial ServicesLegalGovernment (local/state) | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.9/5 (25 reviews in Managed Security Services, 6 in MDR), but very small sample size. Virtually no Reddit or G2 discussion. Glassdoor 2.9/5 (25 employee reviews) with only 39% recommending and 22% positive business outlook. Compensation rated 3.3/5, down 17% year-over-year. The Gartner rating looks good on paper but the tiny review count and lack of independent practitioner discussion make it hard to assess real-world performance. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IINIST CSFHIPAAPCI DSS | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (SOC facility attestation) | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2022 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Customer data remains on customer infrastructure in co-managed model. Retention varies by platform and contract. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Lumifi and Tesorion?
Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Lumifi covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do Lumifi and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Lumifi supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Lumifi pricing compare to Tesorion?
Lumifi pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Lumifi: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate service from the Critical Insight division, likely priced separately.; OT/ICS coverage requires the NetWitness partnership (announced Feb 2026) and is not part of standard MDR. Pricing and maturity of this offering are unknown.. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Lumifi or Tesorion?
Choose Lumifi if: healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR, especially those already in the Critical Insight customer base. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Lumifi is not ideal for buyers who need published MTTD/MTTR metrics, transparent pricing, or independent validation (MITRE, Forrester) before committing. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.