LRQA Nettitude vs Tesorion
LRQA Nettitude and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. LRQA Nettitude targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. LRQA Nettitude includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
LRQA Nettitude and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. LRQA Nettitude targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. LRQA Nettitude includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Tesorion offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 2). LRQA Nettitude may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | UK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- UK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | LRQA NettitudeTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft DefenderEndpoint Detection and Response tools | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelCrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEMCloud SIEM platforms | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom pricing. No public commercial per-user or per-endpoint price found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. Public LRQA pages do not publish MDR price bands or standard per-endpoint, per-user or per-GB pricing for the MDR service. Because MDR, SOC-as-a-Service, XDR, EDR, NDR, vulnerability management and incident response are described as a modular portfolio, buyers should confirm exactly what is in the quoted scope. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Confirm whether Incident Response and Digital Forensics are included in the MDR contract or sold as separate retainers/services.. Confirm SIEM and EDR licensing responsibilities, especially for Microsoft Sentinel or CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEM deployments.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found.. Physical SOC location, data residency and raw log export terms should be confirmed in writing. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | |
| Onboarding | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareTechnologyEnergyManufacturingTransportationRetail | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | LRQA Nettitude has strong accreditation evidence, but public buyer-review signal for the MDR service itself is thin. G2's seller profile shows 3.8/5 across two Nettitude reviews, and they are not MDR-specific. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001PCI DSSNCSC CIRCRESTCyber EssentialsDORANIST CSFSOC 2 | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | CREST SOCCREST Penetration TestingCREST Red TeamingCREST Incident ResponseCREST Threat IntelligenceNCSC Cyber Incident Response Assured Service ProviderMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2003 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between LRQA Nettitude and Tesorion?
LRQA Nettitude is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). LRQA Nettitude covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do LRQA Nettitude and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
LRQA Nettitude supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does LRQA Nettitude pricing compare to Tesorion?
LRQA Nettitude pricing: Custom pricing. No public commercial per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with LRQA Nettitude: Confirm whether Incident Response and Digital Forensics are included in the MDR contract or sold as separate retainers/services.; Confirm SIEM and EDR licensing responsibilities, especially for Microsoft Sentinel or CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEM deployments.. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose LRQA Nettitude or Tesorion?
Choose LRQA Nettitude if: uK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. LRQA Nettitude is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing before engaging sales. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.