LMNTRIX vs Tesorion
LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. LMNTRIX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. LMNTRIX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
LMNTRIX is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Tesorion is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations interested in deception technology as part of their MDR stack, not as a separate product | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Single reviewer: under $20/user/yr; unit unclear | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations interested in deception technology as part of their MDR stack, not as a separate product
- Price
- Single reviewer: under $20/user/yr; unit unclear
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | LMNTRIXPLATFORM | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | LMNTRIX EDR (native)Third-party EDR log collection supported | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | LMNTRIX SIEM (native, integrated)Microsoft Sentinel | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not officially published. One PeerSpot reviewer reported under $20/user/year. Claims to be priced lower than competitors' licensing alone. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint tiered pricing. Channel-only (sold exclusively through MSSP and channel partners). | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Channel-only: cannot buy direct, must go through an MSSP partner, which may add margin or limit negotiation. Small company with no outside funding. Ask about business continuity plans and what happens if the company is acquired or shuts down.. Portal still maturing. PeerSpot reviewers describe it as buggy, so factor in potential operational friction during onboarding.. All performance claims are self-reported with no MITRE evaluation or third-party benchmark. Insist on a POV to validate in your environment. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom |
| Channels | SlackTeamsEmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Straightforward deployment with minimal configuration (per PeerSpot reviewers) | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentTechnologyCritical Infrastructure | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | <1 minute for 90% of incidents (self-reported claim) | Not published |
| MTTR | 30 minutes for 90%+ of incidents (self-reported, no independent validation) | Not published |
| Community view | High scores on review platforms but from very small sample sizes. Praised for competitive pricing, all-inclusive model, and responsive support. Criticized for buggy portal and small company size. Zero Reddit presence and no G2 listing, which limits independent validation. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSSGDPR | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSS | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between LMNTRIX and Tesorion?
LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do LMNTRIX and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
LMNTRIX supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with LMNTRIX and not included with Tesorion.
How does LMNTRIX pricing compare to Tesorion?
LMNTRIX pricing: Not officially published. One PeerSpot reviewer reported under $20/user/year. Claims to be priced lower than competitors' licensing alone.. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with LMNTRIX: Channel-only: cannot buy direct, must go through an MSSP partner, which may add margin or limit negotiation; Small company with no outside funding. Ask about business continuity plans and what happens if the company is acquired or shuts down.. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose LMNTRIX or Tesorion?
Choose LMNTRIX if: cost-conscious mid-market teams that want one platform covering endpoint, network, cloud, and identity without add-on fees. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. LMNTRIX is not ideal for risk-averse enterprise buyers who need vendor scale, financial backing, or third-party validated detection metrics. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.