LMNTRIX vs Performanta
LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. LMNTRIX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. LMNTRIX includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
Buyer brief
LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. LMNTRIX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. LMNTRIX includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
LMNTRIX is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Performanta is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations interested in deception technology as part of their MDR stack, not as a separate product | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response |
| Price | Single reviewer: under $20/user/yr; unit unclear | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations interested in deception technology as part of their MDR stack, not as a separate product
- Price
- Single reviewer: under $20/user/yr; unit unclear
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | LMNTRIXPLATFORM | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | LMNTRIX EDR (native)Third-party EDR log collection supported | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | LMNTRIX SIEM (native, integrated) Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not officially published. One PeerSpot reviewer reported under $20/user/year. Claims to be priced lower than competitors' licensing alone. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint tiered pricing. Channel-only (sold exclusively through MSSP and channel partners). | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Channel-only: cannot buy direct, must go through an MSSP partner, which may add margin or limit negotiation. Small company with no outside funding. Ask about business continuity plans and what happens if the company is acquired or shuts down.. Portal still maturing. PeerSpot reviewers describe it as buggy, so factor in potential operational friction during onboarding.. All performance claims are self-reported with no MITRE evaluation or third-party benchmark. Insist on a POV to validate in your environment. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint |
| Channels | SlackTeamsEmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | EuropeAfrica |
| Onboarding | Straightforward deployment with minimal configuration (per PeerSpot reviewers) | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentTechnologyCritical Infrastructure | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism |
| MTTD | <1 minute for 90% of incidents (self-reported claim) | Not published |
| MTTR | 30 minutes for 90%+ of incidents (self-reported, no independent validation) | Not published |
| Community view | High scores on review platforms but from very small sample sizes. Praised for competitive pricing, all-inclusive model, and responsive support. Criticized for buggy portal and small company size. Zero Reddit presence and no G2 listing, which limits independent validation. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSSGDPR | – |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSS | – |
| Founded | 2015 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between LMNTRIX and Performanta?
LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). LMNTRIX covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Performanta.
How do LMNTRIX and Performanta differ in response capabilities?
LMNTRIX supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with LMNTRIX and not included with Performanta.
How does LMNTRIX pricing compare to Performanta?
LMNTRIX pricing: Not officially published. One PeerSpot reviewer reported under $20/user/year. Claims to be priced lower than competitors' licensing alone.. Performanta pricing: Not published. Watch for with LMNTRIX: Channel-only: cannot buy direct, must go through an MSSP partner, which may add margin or limit negotiation; Small company with no outside funding. Ask about business continuity plans and what happens if the company is acquired or shuts down.. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost..
Should I choose LMNTRIX or Performanta?
Choose LMNTRIX if: cost-conscious mid-market teams that want one platform covering endpoint, network, cloud, and identity without add-on fees. Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. LMNTRIX is not ideal for risk-averse enterprise buyers who need vendor scale, financial backing, or third-party validated detection metrics. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.