AhnLab vs LMNTRIX
AhnLab and LMNTRIX are both Platform vendors that bring their own security platform. AhnLab targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while LMNTRIX serves Mid-market and Enterprise. AhnLab includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for LMNTRIX (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
AhnLab and LMNTRIX are both Platform vendors that bring their own security platform. AhnLab targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while LMNTRIX serves Mid-market and Enterprise. AhnLab includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for LMNTRIX (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
LMNTRIX offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 1). AhnLab may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | South Korean and APAC organizations that already run AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR | Organizations interested in deception technology as part of their MDR stack, not as a separate product |
| Price | Custom quote | Single reviewer: under $20/user/yr; unit unclear |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- South Korean and APAC organizations that already run AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations interested in deception technology as part of their MDR stack, not as a separate product
- Price
- Single reviewer: under $20/user/yr; unit unclear
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | AhnLabPLATFORM | LMNTRIXPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | AhnLab EDR | LMNTRIX EDR (native)Third-party EDR log collection supported |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | LMNTRIX SIEM (native, integrated)Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContain | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not officially published. One PeerSpot reviewer reported under $20/user/year. Claims to be priced lower than competitors' licensing alone. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Based on the number of AhnLab EDR agents installed. AhnLab says EDR Premium includes the EDR license fee and that service cost requires a separate inquiry. | Per-endpoint tiered pricing. Channel-only (sold exclusively through MSSP and channel partners). |
| Hidden cost warnings | The service is tied to AhnLab's endpoint stack, so buyers with existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender or SentinelOne deployments should price migration and overlap.. AhnLab separates basic MDR from paid EDR Premium. Buyers should confirm which response actions are included in each tier.. Public materials do not disclose minimum seats, regional availability, SLA terms or retained-forensics scope.. Fuller cross-domain detection may require AhnLab XDR, TIP, MDS, cloud or CPS products outside endpoint MDR. | Channel-only: cannot buy direct, must go through an MSSP partner, which may add margin or limit negotiation. Small company with no outside funding. Ask about business continuity plans and what happens if the company is acquired or shuts down.. Portal still maturing. PeerSpot reviewers describe it as buggy, so factor in potential operational friction during onboarding.. All performance claims are self-reported with no MITRE evaluation or third-party benchmark. Insist on a POV to validate in your environment. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Per EDR agent, Custom quote, EDR Premium paid tier | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | SlackTeamsEmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | APAC | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Requires AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR plus external transmission of AhnLab EDR detection logs. Public materials do not publish a standard onboarding timeline. | Straightforward deployment with minimal configuration (per PeerSpot reviewers) |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesManufacturingGovernmentHealthcare | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentTechnologyCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | <1 minute for 90% of incidents (self-reported claim) |
| MTTR | Not published | 30 minutes for 90%+ of incidents (self-reported, no independent validation) |
| Community view | AhnLab has stronger public proof around endpoint products than around MDR delivery. English-language MDR-specific buyer reviews are sparse, so buyers should validate analyst quality, escalation process and regional support through references. | High scores on review platforms but from very small sample sizes. Praised for competitive pricing, all-inclusive model, and responsive support. Criticized for buggy portal and small company size. Zero Reddit presence and no G2 listing, which limits independent validation. |
| Compliance | MITRE ATT&CK evaluationsSE Labs Advanced Security Test | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSSGDPR |
| Certifications | SE Labs AAA rating for AhnLab EPP/EDRMITRE ATT&CK Evaluations Round 7 participant | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSS |
| Founded | 1995 | 2015 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. AhnLab EDR collects endpoint behavior, file, registry, network, process, system and Windows event-log data for analysis in EDR Analyzer. | Not publicly disclosed |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between AhnLab and LMNTRIX?
AhnLab is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). AhnLab covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for LMNTRIX.
How do AhnLab and LMNTRIX differ in response capabilities?
AhnLab supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. LMNTRIX supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with AhnLab and included with LMNTRIX.
How does AhnLab pricing compare to LMNTRIX?
AhnLab pricing: Not published. LMNTRIX pricing: Not officially published. One PeerSpot reviewer reported under $20/user/year. Claims to be priced lower than competitors' licensing alone.. Watch for with AhnLab: The service is tied to AhnLab's endpoint stack, so buyers with existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender or SentinelOne deployments should price migration and overlap.; AhnLab separates basic MDR from paid EDR Premium. Buyers should confirm which response actions are included in each tier.. Watch for with LMNTRIX: Channel-only: cannot buy direct, must go through an MSSP partner, which may add margin or limit negotiation; Small company with no outside funding. Ask about business continuity plans and what happens if the company is acquired or shuts down..
Should I choose AhnLab or LMNTRIX?
Choose AhnLab if: south Korean and APAC organizations that already run AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR. Choose LMNTRIX if: cost-conscious mid-market teams that want one platform covering endpoint, network, cloud, and identity without add-on fees. AhnLab is not ideal for buyers that want MDR layered on top of existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, SentinelOne or other endpoint tools. LMNTRIX is not ideal for risk-averse enterprise buyers who need vendor scale, financial backing, or third-party validated detection metrics.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.