ITC Secure vs SECUINFRA
ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SECUINFRA serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. ITC Secure includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 5 for SECUINFRA (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SECUINFRA serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. ITC Secure includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 5 for SECUINFRA (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
ITC Secure (Microsoft-ecosystem) and SECUINFRA (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize ITC Secure's itc secure fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mxdr with pulse portal visibility, service re... or SECUINFRA's fits german and eu buyers that put data sovereignty first and want a partner that will work insid....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform | German SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- German SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | ITC SecureTECH-AGNOSTIC | SECUINFRATECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrikeSentinelOne Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | SplunkElasticIBM QRadar Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. ITC Secure does not publish MXDR powered by Pulse package pricing. | Custom quote, varies by chosen tier (full-service MDR, Co-Managed MDR, On-Premises MDR) and integrated SIEM and EDR. Sold direct. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison.. ITC Secure publishes broad MXDR components, including endpoint, identity, Office 365, cloud apps, storage, vulnerability management and OT. Buyers should confirm which components are included in their quote.. Public pages do not define default response authority, so containment permissions and approval rules should be written into the contract.. Incident response is listed as a separate service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MXDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. | On-Premises tier requires the customer to keep running their own SIEM hardware and licensing. Co-Managed tier means the customer's team still executes part of the response. No published SLA, response timing depends on the underlying SIEM and EDR you bring |
| Data portability | Partial | Full |
| Contract terms | Custom, MXDR powered by Pulse, Managed services, Incident Response | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | |
| Onboarding | Not published. ITC Secure publishes security engineering and SOC onboarding as a build-and-deploy service, but no standard MXDR implementation duration was found. | Vendor reports onboarding compressed from 1 week to 1 day for Microsoft-stack customers |
| Industry focus | Not published | ManufacturingFinancial ServicesPublic SectorHealthcareEnergy |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on ITC Secure's Microsoft focus, Microsoft Verified Managed XDR status, Pulse portal, long managed-service history and broad MXDR service components. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, SOC operating model and exact component inclusion directly. | SECUINFRA has a Gartner Peer Insights vendor profile in the MDR category but limited English-language community coverage on G2 and PeerSpot. Most public sentiment comes from German-language IT press and the firm's own publishing. Buyers shopping outside Germany should expect to lean on direct references. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1 | ISO 27001:2013 |
| Certifications | Microsoft Verified Managed XDRMicrosoft Solutions Partner in SecurityMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Modern WorkMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Infrastructure AzureMicrosoft Intelligent Security AssociationCyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1ISO/IEC 27001Great Place to Work Certification | ISO 27001:2013 (TÜV Thüringen, scope covers Berlin and Frankfurt) |
| Founded | – | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published. ITC Secure says Pulse provides visibility into customer security posture, activities, incident trends, Microsoft license consumption and service metrics. No standard public MXDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between ITC Secure and SECUINFRA?
ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ITC Secure covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for SECUINFRA.
How do ITC Secure and SECUINFRA differ in response capabilities?
ITC Secure supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable. SECUINFRA supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with ITC Secure and included with SECUINFRA.
How does ITC Secure pricing compare to SECUINFRA?
ITC Secure pricing: Not published. SECUINFRA pricing: Not published. Watch for with ITC Secure: Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison.. Watch for with SECUINFRA: On-Premises tier requires the customer to keep running their own SIEM hardware and licensing; Co-Managed tier means the customer's team still executes part of the response.
Should I choose ITC Secure or SECUINFRA?
Choose ITC Secure if: microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform. Choose SECUINFRA if: german SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment. ITC Secure is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. SECUINFRA is not ideal for non-European multinationals needing 24/7 follow-the-sun coverage from regional SOCs.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.