ITC Secure vs PAGO Networks
ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; PAGO Networks serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. ITC Secure includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 2 for PAGO Networks (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; PAGO Networks serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. ITC Secure includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 2 for PAGO Networks (Endpoint, Network).
ITC Secure (Microsoft-ecosystem) and PAGO Networks (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize ITC Secure's itc secure fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mxdr with pulse portal visibility, service re... or PAGO Networks's apac-focused mdr with active remediation, multi-vendor edr/xdr support via stellar cyber, dark we....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform | Organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Configurable | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | ITC SecureTECH-AGNOSTIC | PAGO NetworksTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | SentinelOneDeep Instinct |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Stellar Cyber Open XDR |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Identity | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. ITC Secure does not publish MXDR powered by Pulse package pricing. | Custom quotes based on endpoint/device count and coverage scope. No published pricing tiers. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison.. ITC Secure publishes broad MXDR components, including endpoint, identity, Office 365, cloud apps, storage, vulnerability management and OT. Buyers should confirm which components are included in their quote.. Public pages do not define default response authority, so containment permissions and approval rules should be written into the contract.. Incident response is listed as a separate service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MXDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. | No published pricing. Requires custom quote, so budget planning without a sales call is impossible.. Requires a compatible EDR platform (SentinelOne, Deep Instinct) or integration via Stellar Cyber Open XDR. Factor in EDR licensing if you don't already have one.. OT/ICS coverage is a separate add-on via a CyberXCenter partnership, not part of the base MDR service.. Most documentation, case studies, and support materials are in Korean. English-language resources are limited. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, MXDR powered by Pulse, Managed services, Incident Response | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Asia-Pacific | |
| Onboarding | Not published. ITC Secure publishes security engineering and SOC onboarding as a build-and-deploy service, but no standard MXDR implementation duration was found. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Not published | ManufacturingChemicalSemiconductorRetailTechnologyFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on ITC Secure's Microsoft focus, Microsoft Verified Managed XDR status, Pulse portal, long managed-service history and broad MXDR service components. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, SOC operating model and exact component inclusion directly. | MSSP Alert Top 250 (2025). Gartner Peer Insights shows 5.0/5 across 50+ reviews, though most reviewers are from APAC. Great Place To Work certified 2025-2026. Very little visibility in Western cybersecurity communities. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1 | – |
| Certifications | Microsoft Verified Managed XDRMicrosoft Solutions Partner in SecurityMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Modern WorkMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Infrastructure AzureMicrosoft Intelligent Security AssociationCyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1ISO/IEC 27001Great Place to Work Certification | MSSP Alert Top 250 (2025)Great Place To Work Certified 2025-2026 |
| Founded | – | 2017 |
| Data retention | Not published. ITC Secure says Pulse provides visibility into customer security posture, activities, incident trends, Microsoft license consumption and service metrics. No standard public MXDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between ITC Secure and PAGO Networks?
ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ITC Secure covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for PAGO Networks.
How do ITC Secure and PAGO Networks differ in response capabilities?
ITC Secure supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable. PAGO Networks supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with ITC Secure and included with PAGO Networks.
How does ITC Secure pricing compare to PAGO Networks?
ITC Secure pricing: Not published. PAGO Networks pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with ITC Secure: Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison.. Watch for with PAGO Networks: No published pricing. Requires custom quote, so budget planning without a sales call is impossible.; Requires a compatible EDR platform (SentinelOne, Deep Instinct) or integration via Stellar Cyber Open XDR. Factor in EDR licensing if you don't already have one..
Should I choose ITC Secure or PAGO Networks?
Choose ITC Secure if: microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform. Choose PAGO Networks if: organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support. ITC Secure is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. PAGO Networks is not ideal for north American or European organizations needing SOC presence in those regions (PAGO has no operational SOCs there yet).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.