ITC Secure vs LRQA Nettitude
ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. LRQA Nettitude is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; LRQA Nettitude serves Mid-market and Enterprise. ITC Secure includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 2 for LRQA Nettitude (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. LRQA Nettitude is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; LRQA Nettitude serves Mid-market and Enterprise. ITC Secure includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 2 for LRQA Nettitude (Endpoint, Network).
ITC Secure (Microsoft-ecosystem) and LRQA Nettitude (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize ITC Secure's itc secure fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mxdr with pulse portal visibility, service re... or LRQA Nettitude's lrqa nettitude is strongest where mdr is part of a wider assurance, testing and incident-response....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform | UK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- UK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | ITC SecureTECH-AGNOSTIC | LRQA NettitudeTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Endpoint Detection and Response tools Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEMCloud SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. No public commercial per-user or per-endpoint price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. ITC Secure does not publish MXDR powered by Pulse package pricing. | Custom pricing. Public LRQA pages do not publish MDR price bands or standard per-endpoint, per-user or per-GB pricing for the MDR service. Because MDR, SOC-as-a-Service, XDR, EDR, NDR, vulnerability management and incident response are described as a modular portfolio, buyers should confirm exactly what is in the quoted scope. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison.. ITC Secure publishes broad MXDR components, including endpoint, identity, Office 365, cloud apps, storage, vulnerability management and OT. Buyers should confirm which components are included in their quote.. Public pages do not define default response authority, so containment permissions and approval rules should be written into the contract.. Incident response is listed as a separate service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MXDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. | Confirm whether Incident Response and Digital Forensics are included in the MDR contract or sold as separate retainers/services.. Confirm SIEM and EDR licensing responsibilities, especially for Microsoft Sentinel or CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEM deployments.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found.. Physical SOC location, data residency and raw log export terms should be confirmed in writing. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, MXDR powered by Pulse, Managed services, Incident Response | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | ||
| Onboarding | Not published. ITC Secure publishes security engineering and SOC onboarding as a build-and-deploy service, but no standard MXDR implementation duration was found. | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | Not published | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareTechnologyEnergyManufacturingTransportationRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on ITC Secure's Microsoft focus, Microsoft Verified Managed XDR status, Pulse portal, long managed-service history and broad MXDR service components. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, SOC operating model and exact component inclusion directly. | LRQA Nettitude has strong accreditation evidence, but public buyer-review signal for the MDR service itself is thin. G2's seller profile shows 3.8/5 across two Nettitude reviews, and they are not MDR-specific. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1 | ISO 27001PCI DSSNCSC CIRCRESTCyber EssentialsDORANIST CSFSOC 2 |
| Certifications | Microsoft Verified Managed XDRMicrosoft Solutions Partner in SecurityMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Modern WorkMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Infrastructure AzureMicrosoft Intelligent Security AssociationCyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1ISO/IEC 27001Great Place to Work Certification | CREST SOCCREST Penetration TestingCREST Red TeamingCREST Incident ResponseCREST Threat IntelligenceNCSC Cyber Incident Response Assured Service ProviderMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security |
| Founded | – | 2003 |
| Data retention | Not published. ITC Secure says Pulse provides visibility into customer security posture, activities, incident trends, Microsoft license consumption and service metrics. No standard public MXDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between ITC Secure and LRQA Nettitude?
ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). LRQA Nettitude is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ITC Secure covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for LRQA Nettitude.
How do ITC Secure and LRQA Nettitude differ in response capabilities?
ITC Secure supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable. LRQA Nettitude supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does ITC Secure pricing compare to LRQA Nettitude?
ITC Secure pricing: Not published. LRQA Nettitude pricing: Custom pricing. No public commercial per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Watch for with ITC Secure: Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison.. Watch for with LRQA Nettitude: Confirm whether Incident Response and Digital Forensics are included in the MDR contract or sold as separate retainers/services.; Confirm SIEM and EDR licensing responsibilities, especially for Microsoft Sentinel or CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEM deployments..
Should I choose ITC Secure or LRQA Nettitude?
Choose ITC Secure if: microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform. Choose LRQA Nettitude if: uK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR. ITC Secure is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. LRQA Nettitude is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing before engaging sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.