Integrity360 vs SISA ProACT
Integrity360 and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Integrity360 targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Integrity360 includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Buyer brief
Integrity360 and SISA ProACT are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Integrity360 targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Integrity360 includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Integrity360 offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 0). SISA ProACT may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions | Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Integrity360TECH-AGNOSTIC | SISA ProACTTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Disable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Custom quotes only. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | Business hours |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint pricing. No SIEM ingestion fees. Custom quotes based on environment size. | Custom quote. SISA does not publish ProACT MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Darktrace NDR integration requires separate Darktrace licensing, not included in MDR pricing. Technology-agnostic model means the customer must own their own EDR/XDR licenses separately. Extended log storage is an add-on, default retention period not published. The 1-hour response commitment requires a separate IR retainer purchase on top of the base MDR service | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. ProACT lists many stack components, including SIEM, EDR, CASB, UEBA, SOAR, threat hunting and dark web monitoring, so buyers should confirm which are included in the base quote.. Response automation is a major part of the pitch, so pre-approved SOAR actions and rollback rules should be documented before go-live.. DFIR and payment forensic services are adjacent SISA services, so buyers should confirm what investigation and response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom, ProACT Agentic SOC, ProACT MXDR, DFIR Retainer Services |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | Portal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAfricaNorth America | |
| Onboarding | Approximately 6 weeks for core MDR. Includes log source integration, detection rule tuning, and honeypot deployment. | Not published. SISA says ProACT can use a customized and scalable stack with cloud and on-premise deployment options, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentInsuranceRetailTelecommunications | PaymentsFintechFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Representative Vendor in 5 Market Guides and holds SOC 2 Type II, CREST, and ISO 27001 certifications. Virtually no customer reviews exist on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights, making independent sentiment verification impossible. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on SISA's payment-security focus, ProACT Agentic SOC, forensic intelligence, 1,000+ customer claim, 40+ country footprint and PCI forensic-investigation credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, SOC delivery model, response authority and non-payment use cases directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27018ISO 27701CREST CSIRCREST Penetration Testing | PCI DSSPCI PINPCI 3DSPCI P2PEPCI S3PCI S-SLCPCI MPoCSWIFTGDPR |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27018ISO 27701CREST Cyber Security Incident ResponseCREST Penetration TestingMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security | PCI Global Payment Forensic InvestigatorPCI Qualified Security AssessorPCI-recognized laboratory for MPoC security evaluationsPCI GEAR committee member |
| Founded | 2005 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not published. Extended log storage available as add-on. | SISA says ProACT supports PCI-compliant cloud deployments and on-premise options for data localization requirements, including custom Kubernetes and GCP environments. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Integrity360 and SISA ProACT?
Integrity360 is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SISA ProACT is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Integrity360 covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for SISA ProACT.
How do Integrity360 and SISA ProACT differ in response capabilities?
Integrity360 supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. SISA ProACT supports 2 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Integrity360 and not included with SISA ProACT.
How does Integrity360 pricing compare to SISA ProACT?
Integrity360 pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. SISA ProACT pricing: Not published. Watch for with Integrity360: Darktrace NDR integration requires separate Darktrace licensing, not included in MDR pricing; Technology-agnostic model means the customer must own their own EDR/XDR licenses separately. Watch for with SISA ProACT: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment..
Should I choose Integrity360 or SISA ProACT?
Choose Integrity360 if: european mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions. Choose SISA ProACT if: banks, payment processors, fintechs and payment ecosystem buyers that want MDR informed by forensic-investigation experience. Integrity360 is not ideal for organizations wanting a single-vendor platform where EDR and MDR come from the same provider. SISA ProACT is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.