Integrity360 vs Macnica
Integrity360 and Macnica are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Integrity360 targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Integrity360 includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Integrity360 and Macnica are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Integrity360 targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Integrity360 includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Integrity360 offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 2). Macnica may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Integrity360TECH-AGNOSTIC | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrike FalconTrellix EDRCustomer EDR tools |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Customer SIEM and log platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Custom quotes only. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Identity | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint pricing. No SIEM ingestion fees. Custom quotes based on environment size. | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Darktrace NDR integration requires separate Darktrace licensing, not included in MDR pricing. Technology-agnostic model means the customer must own their own EDR/XDR licenses separately. Extended log storage is an add-on, default retention period not published. The 1-hour response commitment requires a separate IR retainer purchase on top of the base MDR service | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAfricaNorth America | APAC |
| Onboarding | Approximately 6 weeks for core MDR. Includes log source integration, detection rule tuning, and honeypot deployment. | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentInsuranceRetailTelecommunications | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Representative Vendor in 5 Market Guides and holds SOC 2 Type II, CREST, and ISO 27001 certifications. Virtually no customer reviews exist on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights, making independent sentiment verification impossible. | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27018ISO 27701CREST CSIRCREST Penetration Testing | – |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27018ISO 27701CREST Cyber Security Incident ResponseCREST Penetration TestingMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security | – |
| Founded | 2005 | – |
| Data retention | Not published. Extended log storage available as add-on. | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Integrity360 and Macnica?
Integrity360 is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Integrity360 covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Macnica.
How do Integrity360 and Macnica differ in response capabilities?
Integrity360 supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Integrity360 and not included with Macnica.
How does Integrity360 pricing compare to Macnica?
Integrity360 pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. Macnica pricing: Not published. Watch for with Integrity360: Darktrace NDR integration requires separate Darktrace licensing, not included in MDR pricing; Technology-agnostic model means the customer must own their own EDR/XDR licenses separately. Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR..
Should I choose Integrity360 or Macnica?
Choose Integrity360 if: european mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions. Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. Integrity360 is not ideal for organizations wanting a single-vendor platform where EDR and MDR come from the same provider. Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.