Innofactor MDRaaS vs Stoik
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Stoik is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Stoik serves SMB.
Buyer brief
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Stoik is a Cyber insurer that works with your existing tools. Innofactor MDRaaS targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Stoik serves SMB.
Innofactor MDRaaS (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Stoik (Cyber insurer) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Innofactor MDRaaS's innofactor mdraas fits microsoft-heavy nordic buyers that want sentinel-based monitoring while ke... or Stoik's stoik removes the friction of buying cyber insurance and mdr separately by bundling both for euro....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel | European SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 0/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Innofactor MDRaaSTECH-AGNOSTIC | StoikTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrike |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: Optional add-onCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Not coveredIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Not coveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Approval Required |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. MDR is not priced separately from insurance. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| Identity | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | Not offered |
| Network | + Optional | Not offered |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Tiered custom quote. Innofactor publishes Basic, Standard and Advanced MDRaaS tiers, each marked ask for pricing. | Bundled annual pricing combining cyber insurance and MDR. Price varies by company size, revenue, sector and coverage tier. Sold through 2,000+ broker partners only. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.. Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect.. Public pages do not publish named response actions or response SLAs.. Customers keep ownership of logs and incidents, so internal responsibility for mitigation should be clear before signing. | Requires CrowdStrike Falcon EDR deployment. Cannot use a competing endpoint agent.. MDR is only available bundled with a Stoik insurance policy. No standalone MDR purchase option.. Sold through broker partners only. No direct purchase from Stoik.. Revenue cap: companies up to 1B EUR turnover (expanded from 750M EUR after CyberContract acquisition in September 2025). |
| Data portability | Full | Limited |
| Contract terms | Tier1 Basic, Tier2 Standard, Tier3 Advanced, Custom | Annual |
| Channels | EmailPhonePortal | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | Innofactor says the core infrastructure resides in the customer's Azure cloud environment and needs no on-premises infrastructure. It describes deployment as rapid and light, but does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | CrowdStrike Falcon agent deployment, no minimum endpoint requirement published |
| Industry focus | Public SectorFinancial ServicesTechnology | Professional ServicesRetailManufacturingTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Innofactor has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Nordic Microsoft expertise, Sentinel in the customer's Azure environment, tiered service levels and clear customer control of logs and incidents. Buyers should validate response authority, total licensing cost, add-on scope and Tier3 operating model before signing. | Almost no English-language reviews. 10,000+ insured companies and 200%+ YoY growth show market traction in continental Europe. Backed by a16z, Munich Re Ventures and Alven (~$78M raised through Series C in Jan 2026). Practitioner sentiment on MDR quality is impossible to gauge from public sources. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 13485AQAP-2110ISO 14001 | GDPR |
| Certifications | ISO 9001:2015ISO 13485:2016ISO/IEC 27001:2022AQAP-2110ISO 14001:2015Microsoft Solution Partner designationsMicrosoft Advanced Specializations | – |
| Founded | 2000 | 2021 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. Innofactor says logs and incidents remain in the customer's own Azure environment. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Innofactor MDRaaS and Stoik?
Innofactor MDRaaS is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Stoik is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Innofactor MDRaaS and Stoik differ in response capabilities?
Innofactor MDRaaS supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Stoik supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Incident response is not included with Innofactor MDRaaS and included with Stoik.
How does Innofactor MDRaaS pricing compare to Stoik?
Innofactor MDRaaS pricing: Not published. Stoik pricing: Not published. MDR is not priced separately from insurance.. Watch for with Innofactor MDRaaS: Tier1 and Tier2 cover regular business hours, not 24/7.; Endpoint and network detection are add-ons, so base SIEM-only scope may be narrower than buyers expect.. Watch for with Stoik: Requires CrowdStrike Falcon EDR deployment. Cannot use a competing endpoint agent.; MDR is only available bundled with a Stoik insurance policy. No standalone MDR purchase option..
Should I choose Innofactor MDRaaS or Stoik?
Choose Innofactor MDRaaS if: nordic buyers already committed to Microsoft Azure and Sentinel. Choose Stoik if: european SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle. Innofactor MDRaaS is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or response SLAs before sales engagement. Stoik is not ideal for organizations needing active remediation or autonomous containment.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.