InfoGuard vs Orange Cyberdefense
InfoGuard and Orange Cyberdefense are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Orange Cyberdefense serves Mid-market and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for Orange Cyberdefense (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
InfoGuard and Orange Cyberdefense are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. InfoGuard targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Orange Cyberdefense serves Mid-market and Enterprise. InfoGuard includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 5 for Orange Cyberdefense (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Orange Cyberdefense offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 4). InfoGuard may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs | Large European enterprises needing ANSSI, CREST, or NATO-accredited MDR with local SOC presence |
| Price | Custom quote | Azure package: EUR 3,300/mo for 300 users |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Large European enterprises needing ANSSI, CREST, or NATO-accredited MDR with local SOC presence
- Price
- Azure package: EUR 3,300/mo for 300 users
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | InfoGuardTECH-AGNOSTIC | Orange CyberdefenseTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint telemetry | Microsoft DefenderPalo Alto Cortex |
| SIEM integrations | Customer log sources | Microsoft SentinelPalo Alto Cortex XSIAM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Azure Marketplace: Managed Threat Detection [XDR] for Defender Endpoint P2: 3,300 EUR/month for 300 users. Managed Threat Detection [log] for Sentinel: 16,500 EUR/month up to 50 GB/day. Third-party estimate: avg ~$37K/year, max ~$100K/year. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. InfoGuard does not publish MDR package pricing. | Enterprise custom pricing. Some SKUs listed on Azure Marketplace with fixed monthly rates. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. InfoGuard offers both Managed SOC and Co-Managed SOC, so buyer-side staffing and responsibility can vary by model.. Data can stay at the customer premises or in Swiss data centres, which may change architecture and retention cost.. Incident Response Retainer exists as a separate offer, so buyers should confirm exactly what incident-response work is included in MDR. | Core MDR platforms are Microsoft Defender or Palo Alto Cortex, licensing costs are separate. Multiple add-on services (threat intelligence, cybercrime monitoring, brand protection) add up. Non-European buyers may find fewer local SOC analysts and slower regional support outside EMEA hours. No published rate card or minimum seat count, making it hard to budget without a sales conversation. Sentinel consumption costs (if using Microsoft platform) are separate |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Co-Managed SOC, Incident Response Retainer | Annual, Multi-year enterprise agreements |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | EuropeNorth AmericaAfricaAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | InfoGuard's Cyber Defence brochure states 4 weeks for structured SOC onboarding. Buyers should confirm which log sources, sensors and response playbooks are included in that onboarding scope. | Not publicly specified. Expect enterprise-scale timelines. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesInsuranceManufacturingEnergyHealthcareRetailService ProvidersPublic Sector | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetail/DistributionEnergyTransportGovernment/Public SectorIndustrial/OTManufacturing |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on InfoGuard's Swiss and German SOC delivery, 90+ SOC and CSIRT experts, open XDR platform, data-residency options and incident-response credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and exact co-managed responsibilities directly. | Strong analyst recognition: Forrester Strong Performer for MDR Europe (Q3 2025), IDC MarketScape European MDR Leader (2024). Zero practitioner reviews found on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit, which makes independent validation impossible. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 Type 2GDPRSwiss DSG | SOC 2 Type 2PCI DSS (QSA and ASV)ANSSI (French national cybersecurity agency)CRESTNATO Security Accreditation |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 14001ISAE 3000 Type 2-audited Cyber Defence CenterBSI-qualified APT Response service providerFIRST member | SOC 2 Type 2PCI DSS QSA (Qualified Security Assessor)PCI DSS ASV (Approved Scanning Vendor)ANSSI PASSI RGS/LPM, PDIS LPM, PRISCREST (international infosec accreditation)FIRST MembershipNATO Security AccreditationTF-CSIRT (European task force)Europol PartnershipMicrosoft Solutions Partner (Security, Azure) |
| Founded | 2001 | 2014 |
| Data retention | InfoGuard says data is stored exclusively at the customer's premises or in its redundant data centres in Switzerland. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Not publicly specified |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between InfoGuard and Orange Cyberdefense?
InfoGuard is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Orange Cyberdefense is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). InfoGuard covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Orange Cyberdefense.
How do InfoGuard and Orange Cyberdefense differ in response capabilities?
InfoGuard supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Orange Cyberdefense supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with InfoGuard and not included with Orange Cyberdefense.
How does InfoGuard pricing compare to Orange Cyberdefense?
InfoGuard pricing: Not published. Orange Cyberdefense pricing: Azure Marketplace: Managed Threat Detection [XDR] for Defender Endpoint P2: 3,300 EUR/month for 300 users. Managed Threat Detection [log] for Sentinel: 16,500 EUR/month up to 50 GB/day. Third-party estimate: avg ~$37K/year, max ~$100K/year.. Watch for with InfoGuard: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Named autonomous response actions are not published, so response authority should be written into the contract.. Watch for with Orange Cyberdefense: Core MDR platforms are Microsoft Defender or Palo Alto Cortex, licensing costs are separate; Multiple add-on services (threat intelligence, cybercrime monitoring, brand protection) add up.
Should I choose InfoGuard or Orange Cyberdefense?
Choose InfoGuard if: swiss, German and Austrian buyers that want MDR from DACH-based SOCs. Choose Orange Cyberdefense if: large European enterprises needing ANSSI, CREST, or NATO-accredited MDR with local SOC presence. InfoGuard is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Orange Cyberdefense is not ideal for sMBs or cost-sensitive buyers, as pricing is enterprise-tier with no public rate cards.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.