Huntress vs Mandiant: MDR Comparison 2026
Huntress (MSP-channel) and Mandiant (Services firm) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Huntress requires its own security platform, while Mandiant works with your existing tools. Huntress targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Mandiant focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. Huntress includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity), compared to 5 for Mandiant (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Huntress vs Mandiant: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable, enterprise-grade MDR with minimal overhead (deploys in 30 minutes)
- •Microsoft 365-heavy environments needing integrated identity threat detection (ITDR with 3-min MTTR)
Choose Mandiant if:
- •Enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations
- •Google Cloud Platform customers wanting native SecOps integration
- •Organizations facing nation-state or advanced persistent threats where Mandiant's frontline IR experience is critical
- •You need Cloud and Network coverage included in base pricing
Bottom line: Huntress is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Mandiant is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Huntress and Mandiant?
Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Mandiant is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Huntress covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Mandiant.
How do Huntress and Mandiant differ in response capabilities?
Huntress supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Mandiant supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Huntress pricing compare to Mandiant?
Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). Mandiant pricing: Estimated ~$83,000/year (third-party estimate from Vendr, not officially published).. Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan; under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately — full stack costs add up. Watch for with Mandiant: ~$83K+/year estimated — premium enterprise pricing; IR retainer is separate — must be purchased independently for full incident response.
Should I choose Huntress or Mandiant?
Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. Choose Mandiant if: enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations. Huntress is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk/Sentinel/Chronicle. Mandiant is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations — ~$83K+/year estimated pricing.