Huntress vs Mandiant
Buyer brief
Updated 2026-03-09
Huntress is built for SMBs and MSPs at around $2.50-3.50/endpoint/month. Mandiant Managed Defense is built for enterprises facing sophisticated threats at an estimated ~$83,000/year. The markets they serve have almost no overlap, and neither do the services.
Huntress analysts isolate endpoints, kill processes and quarantine files with configurable approval modes. Mandiant's MDR is limited to isolating hosts and containing network segments. Beyond that, Mandiant provides guidance and expects your team to execute. What Mandiant brings instead is intelligence depth, with 500+ threat analysts across 30+ countries, the M-Trends report from 450,000+ annual consulting hours and frontline IR knowledge feeding into detection logic. Huntress is a CVE Numbering Authority with its own research team, but the scale isn't comparable.
Neither includes incident response in the base price. Mandiant's retainer has a 2-hour response SLA, while Huntress recommends engaging third-party IR firms. Neither provides a breach warranty.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing | Enterprise organizations wanting threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR from 500+ frontline analysts |
| Price | Managed EDR estimate: ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/mo | Mandiant software benchmark: ~$83K/yr; not Managed Defense |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- Price
- Managed EDR estimate: ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/mo
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Enterprise organizations wanting threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR from 500+ frontline analysts
- Price
- Mandiant software benchmark: ~$83K/yr; not Managed Defense
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | HuntressPLATFORM | MandiantTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Very Positive | Positive |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Huntress AgentMicrosoft DefenderSentinelOneCisco Secure Endpoint CrowdStrike Falcon | Microsoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOne Singularity CrowdStrike Falcon |
| SIEM integrations | Huntress Managed SIEM | Google Security Operations (native integration) |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantine | IsolateContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. | Third-party buyer data reports an average Mandiant software cost around $83,000/year. Treat this as a Mandiant buyer benchmark, not a clean Managed Defense MDR quote. |
| Minimum seats | 50 | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint (EDR), per-identity (ITDR), per-data-source (SIEM). Volume discounts for MSPs. | Custom enterprise subscription pricing. Factors: users, data volume, features, contract terms. |
| Hidden cost warnings | 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan, under 50 requires sales engagement. Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately, full stack costs add up. Managed SIEM priced per data source with pooled data allocation, overages possible. Pricing not publicly published, requires sales engagement. No breach warranty | ~$83K+/year estimated, premium enterprise pricing. IR retainer is separate and must be purchased independently for full incident response. Managed Defense for Google SecOps currently GA in US only, international customers face limitations |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Monthly | Custom enterprise agreements |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Agent deploys in under 30 minutes and appears in portal within ~15 minutes of install. Pre-built deployment scripts for RMM tools. | 4-8 weeks typical for enterprise deployments |
| Industry focus | MSP/MSSP ChannelHealthcareFinancial ServicesLegalEducationGovernment (Local/State)Manufacturing | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernment (Federal)DefenseCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not separately published | Not formally published. Claims alerts triaged by expert within minutes. |
| MTTR | 8 minutes average for Managed EDR, 3 minutes average for Managed ITDR (M365) | Not formally published. Claims response in minutes, not hours. Participated in 2020 MITRE ATT&CK evaluation (APT29) with one of the highest enriched alert counts in the MSSP detection category. |
| Community view | Rated 4.8/5 on G2 from 1,086 reviews and 9.4/10 on PeerSpot. MSPs consistently recommend Huntress for SMB environments, though reporting, API access, and the lack of breach warranty draw criticism. | Mandiant brand is synonymous with threat intelligence and incident response. TrustRadius 6.9/10 (11 reviews). PeerSpot 8.4/10 (Mandiant Advantage, not MDR-specific). Limited public reviews for Managed Defense specifically. Primary criticism: premium pricing, dashboard complexity, and IR being a separate retainer despite Mandiant's IR reputation. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IGDPRCCPA | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27017ISO 27018FedRAMP HighPCI DSSGDPR |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type I (Security, Availability, Confidentiality)CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) | SOC 2 Type II (via Google Cloud)ISO 27001 (via Google Cloud)FedRAMP High P-ATO (Google Cloud infrastructure, 150+ services). Mandiant Advantage Automated Defense is FedRAMP Ready at High Impact Level (2022).ISO 27017 (via Google Cloud)ISO 27018 (via Google Cloud) |
| Founded | 2015 | 2004 |
| Data retention | Managed SIEM: 1 year default (1 month active + 11 months cold). Extended add-on: 90 days active + up to 7 years cold. Logs are immutable. 30-day post-term retention for data migration. | Per-contract basis. Google Cloud data residency options available. |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Huntress and Mandiant?
Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Mandiant is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Huntress covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Mandiant.
How do Huntress and Mandiant differ in response capabilities?
Huntress supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Mandiant supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable.
How does Huntress pricing compare to Mandiant?
Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). Mandiant pricing: Third-party buyer data reports an average Mandiant software cost around $83,000/year. Treat this as a Mandiant buyer benchmark, not a clean Managed Defense MDR quote.. Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan, under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately, full stack costs add up. Watch for with Mandiant: ~$83K+/year estimated, premium enterprise pricing; IR retainer is separate and must be purchased independently for full incident response.
Should I choose Huntress or Mandiant?
Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. Choose Mandiant if: enterprise organizations wanting threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR from 500+ frontline analysts. Huntress is not ideal for enterprises needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk, Sentinel, or Chronicle. Mandiant is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations (~$83K+/year estimated pricing).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.