Huntress vs LMNTRIX: MDR comparison 2026
Huntress is a MSP-channel that requires its own security platform. LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Huntress targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; LMNTRIX serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Huntress includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for LMNTRIX (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable MDR with minimal overhead, deploys in 30 minutes
- •Microsoft 365 environments needing identity threat detection alongside endpoint coverage
Choose LMNTRIX if:
- •Organizations interested in deception technology as part of their MDR stack, not as a separate product
- •Buyers comfortable with a smaller, bootstrapped vendor in exchange for all-inclusive pricing
- •You need Cloud and Identity and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: Huntress (MSP-channel) and LMNTRIX (Platform vendor) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Huntress's the most recommended mdr on r/msp for smb environments or LMNTRIX's genuinely differentiated by all-inclusive pricing and integrated deception technology in a single....
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Huntress and LMNTRIX?
Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: Huntress offers Not disclosed, LMNTRIX offers ≤30 minutes. Huntress covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for LMNTRIX.
How do Huntress and LMNTRIX differ in response capabilities?
Huntress supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. LMNTRIX supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Huntress and included with LMNTRIX.
How does Huntress pricing compare to LMNTRIX?
Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). LMNTRIX pricing: Not officially published. One PeerSpot reviewer reported 'under $20 per user annually'. Claims to be priced lower than competitors' licensing alone.. Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan, under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately, full stack costs add up. Watch for with LMNTRIX: Channel-only: cannot buy direct, must go through an MSSP partner, which may add margin or limit negotiation; Small company with no outside funding. Ask about business continuity plans and what happens if the company is acquired or shuts down..
Should I choose Huntress or LMNTRIX?
Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. Choose LMNTRIX if: cost-conscious mid-market teams that want one platform covering endpoint, network, cloud, and identity without add-on fees. Huntress is not ideal for enterprises needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk, Sentinel, or Chronicle. LMNTRIX is not ideal for risk-averse enterprise buyers who need vendor scale, financial backing, or third-party validated detection metrics.