Hitachi Cyber vs Tesorion
Hitachi Cyber and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Hitachi Cyber targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Hitachi Cyber includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Hitachi Cyber and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Hitachi Cyber targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Hitachi Cyber includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Hitachi Cyber offers broader coverage (6 surfaces vs. 4). Tesorion may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Existing Hitachi enterprise customers consolidating security services with a vendor they already work with | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Existing Hitachi enterprise customers consolidating security services with a vendor they already work with
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Hitachi CyberTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender SentinelOne | Customer endpoint telemetry SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelSplunkGoogle Chronicle | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote, not published. Sold direct. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation. OT coverage routes through the new Krakow SOC and may change response timing if your assets sit elsewhere. Services span MDR, MSS and consulting under one roof, scope creep into adjacent services is easy | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyManufacturingTransportationHealthcarePublic Sector | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Hitachi Cyber has limited public review presence on G2, Gartner Peer Insights and PeerSpot for its MDR service specifically. Most independent coverage focuses on the Hitachi corporate parent or Above Security heritage rather than current customer experience. Buyers will need to lean on direct references. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | ISO 9001 (MSS)PCI QSA (Canada, US, LATAM, Caribbean)FIRST member | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | ISO 9001PCI QSAFIRST | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 1999 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Hitachi Cyber and Tesorion?
Hitachi Cyber is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Hitachi Cyber covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do Hitachi Cyber and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Hitachi Cyber supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Hitachi Cyber and not included with Tesorion.
How does Hitachi Cyber pricing compare to Tesorion?
Hitachi Cyber pricing: Not published. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Hitachi Cyber: Pricing is fully custom, no public benchmarks to anchor negotiation; OT coverage routes through the new Krakow SOC and may change response timing if your assets sit elsewhere. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Hitachi Cyber or Tesorion?
Choose Hitachi Cyber if: existing Hitachi enterprise customers consolidating security services with a vendor they already work with. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Hitachi Cyber is not ideal for buyers who need published SLA commitments or independently validated detection metrics. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.