Foresite Cybersecurity vs ITC Secure
Foresite Cybersecurity is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Foresite Cybersecurity targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ITC Secure serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Foresite Cybersecurity is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Foresite Cybersecurity targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ITC Secure serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Foresite Cybersecurity (Pure-play MDR) and ITC Secure (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Foresite Cybersecurity's google cloud secops specialist with deep chronicle siem and compliance automation expertise or ITC Secure's itc secure fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mxdr with pulse portal visibility, service re....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Google Cloud-first organizations wanting deep Chronicle SIEM and SOAR integration from a dedicated Google partner | Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform |
| Price | One-time deployment: from $25,000; MDR custom | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Approval required | 0/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Google Cloud-first organizations wanting deep Chronicle SIEM and SOAR integration from a dedicated Google partner
- Price
- One-time deployment: from $25,000; MDR custom
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Foresite CybersecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | ITC SecureTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeTaniumVMware Carbon Black Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Google Chronicle | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Vendor-published deployment packages start at $25,000. Ongoing MDR service pricing requires custom quote. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on deployment complexity, data volume, and coverage scope. Three one-time deployment packages published on their website: Essential ($25K-$50K), Advanced ($50K-$100K), Security Transformation ($75K-$100K). Ongoing managed services pricing not published. | Custom quote. ITC Secure does not publish MXDR powered by Pulse package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Deployment packages ($25K-$100K) are one-time setup fees on top of ongoing MDR subscription, which is not publicly priced. Google Chronicle SIEM and SOAR licensing costs may be separate from Foresite's managed service fees -- clarify who holds the Chronicle license. Data ingestion costs scale with log volume on Chronicle platform, which can grow unpredictably. Specific response actions available through SOAR playbooks are not publicly documented -- ask exactly what containment actions they can execute. Single SOC site in Kansas means no geographic redundancy or follow-the-sun coverage | Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison.. ITC Secure publishes broad MXDR components, including endpoint, identity, Office 365, cloud apps, storage, vulnerability management and OT. Buyers should confirm which components are included in their quote.. Public pages do not define default response authority, so containment permissions and approval rules should be written into the contract.. Incident response is listed as a separate service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MXDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, MXDR powered by Pulse, Managed services, Incident Response |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North America | |
| Onboarding | Three deployment tiers: Essential ($25K-$50K), Advanced ($50K-$100K), Security Transformation ($75K-$100K). All include onboarding, data ingestion, rule development, and training by Google-certified engineers. Security Transformation adds 30-60 day co-management period. | Not published. ITC Secure publishes security engineering and SOC onboarding as a build-and-deploy service, but no standard MXDR implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentEducationManufacturing | Not published |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | MSSP Alert Top 250 (2020, top 10%). Clutch: 30 reviews with 100% satisfaction rate. Limited presence on Reddit, G2, or PeerSpot. Available feedback highlights strong technical support and effective communication. Small provider (~80-96 employees) with regional Kansas focus and heavy Google Cloud positioning means limited visibility outside the Google ecosystem. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on ITC Secure's Microsoft focus, Microsoft Verified Managed XDR status, Pulse portal, long managed-service history and broad MXDR service components. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, SOC operating model and exact component inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IICMMCHIPAAPCI DSSNIST 800-53ISO 27001 | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1 |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIGoogle Cloud Premier Partner (Security Services Specialization)Google Cloud MSSP BadgeGoogle SecOps Delivery Partner | Microsoft Verified Managed XDRMicrosoft Solutions Partner in SecurityMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Modern WorkMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Infrastructure AzureMicrosoft Intelligent Security AssociationCyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1ISO/IEC 27001Great Place to Work Certification |
| Founded | 2013 | – |
| Data retention | Per Chronicle SIEM retention policies, customer-configurable | Not published. ITC Secure says Pulse provides visibility into customer security posture, activities, incident trends, Microsoft license consumption and service metrics. No standard public MXDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Foresite Cybersecurity and ITC Secure?
Foresite Cybersecurity is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Foresite Cybersecurity and ITC Secure differ in response capabilities?
Foresite Cybersecurity supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. ITC Secure supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Foresite Cybersecurity and not included with ITC Secure.
How does Foresite Cybersecurity pricing compare to ITC Secure?
Foresite Cybersecurity pricing: Vendor-published deployment packages start at $25,000. Ongoing MDR service pricing requires custom quote.. ITC Secure pricing: Not published. Watch for with Foresite Cybersecurity: Deployment packages ($25K-$100K) are one-time setup fees on top of ongoing MDR subscription, which is not publicly priced; Google Chronicle SIEM and SOAR licensing costs may be separate from Foresite's managed service fees -- clarify who holds the Chronicle license. Watch for with ITC Secure: Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison..
Should I choose Foresite Cybersecurity or ITC Secure?
Choose Foresite Cybersecurity if: google Cloud-first organizations wanting deep Chronicle SIEM and SOAR integration from a dedicated Google partner. Choose ITC Secure if: microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform. Foresite Cybersecurity is not ideal for organizations wanting fully autonomous remediation without human approval loops. ITC Secure is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.