Field Effect vs Huntress: MDR Comparison 2026
Field Effect (MDR provider) and Huntress (MSP-channel) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Field Effect requires its own security platform, while Huntress requires its own security platform. Field Effect targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Huntress focuses on SMB and Mid-market. Field Effect includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for Huntress (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Field Effect vs Huntress: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Field Effect if:
- •SMBs and MSPs wanting affordable, easy-to-deploy MDR with published per-user pricing
- •Canadian organizations needing domestic data hosting and PIPEDA compliance
- •Healthcare, government, and defense contractors needing HIPAA/CMMC/NIST compliance support
- •You need Cloud and Network coverage included in base pricing
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable, enterprise-grade MDR with minimal overhead (deploys in 30 minutes)
- •Microsoft 365-heavy environments needing integrated identity threat detection (ITDR with 3-min MTTR)
Bottom line: Field Effect (MDR provider) and Huntress (MSP-channel) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Field Effect's mitre-validated detection (11-min mttd, detected every measured step) with vendor-claimed 99.9% n... or Huntress's the msp community's gold standard for smb-focused mdr.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Field Effect and Huntress?
Field Effect is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Field Effect covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Huntress.
How do Field Effect and Huntress differ in response capabilities?
Field Effect supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Huntress supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable.
How does Field Effect pricing compare to Huntress?
Field Effect pricing: MDR Core: $99/user/month (ideal for <=25 users). MDR Complete: custom pricing (larger organizations, compliance requirements).. Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). Watch for with Field Effect: MDR Core excludes network monitoring, DNS firewall, and dark web monitoring — significant feature gap vs Complete; $99/user adds up quickly — 50 users = $4,950/month. Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan; under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately — full stack costs add up.
Should I choose Field Effect or Huntress?
Choose Field Effect if: sMBs and MSPs wanting affordable, easy-to-deploy MDR with published per-user pricing. Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. Field Effect is not ideal for organizations with existing CrowdStrike/SentinelOne/Defender deployments — requires proprietary Field Effect agent. Huntress is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk/Sentinel/Chronicle.