Eviden vs Macquarie Government
Eviden and Macquarie Government are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Eviden targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Macquarie Government serves Enterprise. Eviden includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 3 for Macquarie Government (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Eviden and Macquarie Government are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Eviden targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Macquarie Government serves Enterprise. Eviden includes 6 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 3 for Macquarie Government (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Eviden offers broader coverage (6 surfaces vs. 3). Macquarie Government may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European and Middle East enterprises wanting a regional services-firm MDR with deep on-the-ground presence | Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European and Middle East enterprises wanting a regional services-firm MDR with deep on-the-ground presence
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | EvidenTECH-AGNOSTIC | Macquarie GovernmentTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft DefenderSentinelOneTrend Micro | Customer endpoint security toolsWorkstation logs |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelSplunkIBM QRadarGoogle Chronicle | Macquarie Government SIEMaaSSplunk EnterpriseCustomer SIEM platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote, negotiated with the regional team. Fully managed and co-managed tiers. Sold direct. | Custom government subscription and procurement model. SOCaaS, SIEMaaS and SASE pricing is not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Pricing varies by region with no public benchmarks, expect long sales cycles. Atos Group is mid-restructuring under the Genesis plan, watch contract terms around continuity. AIsaac value depends on telemetry sitting in Amazon Security Lake or compatible data fabric, your data architecture choice changes pricing | The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs.. SOCaaS is closely tied to Macquarie Government SIEMaaS, Splunk, sovereign hosting, SASE and gateway services; model migration work if replacing the service later.. Buyers should document which automated response actions are allowed by default and which require agency approval.. Log retention, ingestion, secure cloud, SASE and CTI options can materially change the total contract scope. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | SOCaaS subscription, SIEMaaS subscription, SASE for Government, Custom government procurement |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeNorth AmericaAsia-PacificMEA | APAC |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published. Macquarie Government describes customized playbooks aligned with agency security processes and integration with existing security systems. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesPublic SectorEnergyManufacturingDefenseHealthcare | GovernmentDefensePublic SectorCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Eviden has a Gartner Peer Insights MDR vendor profile and analyst recognition but limited grassroots community coverage on Reddit and G2. Buyer perception is shaped more by Atos Group news (Genesis transformation plan, Tech Foundations sale, French State HPC offer) than by independent customer reviews of the MDR service itself. | Macquarie Government has strong vendor-controlled evidence for Australian government sovereignty, 24x7 SOC operations, SIEMaaS, threat intelligence and SASE integration, but little independent MDR-specific buyer-review signal in public communities. Government buyers should use procurement references to validate analyst quality, response authority, onboarding effort and Splunk/log-volume cost exposure. |
| Compliance | Not published | Essential 8ISMIRAPASDACSCDISP |
| Certifications | Not published | NV1-cleared specialistsIndustry Security Program memberAustralian Government Strategic certified data centresPROTECTED-level secure web gateway assessmentIRAP-aligned virtual services gateway language |
| Founded | 2023 | – |
| Data retention | Not published | SIEMaaS pages describe sovereign local hosting and storage of up to seven years of security and event information. Public pages do not publish default retention for SOCaaS contracts or export terms. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Eviden and Macquarie Government?
Eviden is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macquarie Government is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Eviden covers 6 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Macquarie Government.
How do Eviden and Macquarie Government differ in response capabilities?
Eviden supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Macquarie Government supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Eviden and not included with Macquarie Government.
How does Eviden pricing compare to Macquarie Government?
Eviden pricing: Not published. Macquarie Government pricing: Not published. Watch for with Eviden: Pricing varies by region with no public benchmarks, expect long sales cycles; Atos Group is mid-restructuring under the Genesis plan, watch contract terms around continuity. Watch for with Macquarie Government: The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs..
Should I choose Eviden or Macquarie Government?
Choose Eviden if: european and Middle East enterprises wanting a regional services-firm MDR with deep on-the-ground presence. Choose Macquarie Government if: australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR. Eviden is not ideal for sMB and lower mid-market buyers who need fast-onboarding pure-play MDR. Macquarie Government is not ideal for private-sector or non-Australian buyers that do not need a government-specific sovereign provider.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.