DTS Solution vs Kudelski Security
DTS Solution is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. DTS Solution targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Kudelski Security serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DTS Solution includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for Kudelski Security (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
DTS Solution is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. DTS Solution targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Kudelski Security serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DTS Solution includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 5 for Kudelski Security (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
DTS Solution (Services firm) and Kudelski Security (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize DTS Solution's dts hawkeye is a useful regional option for buyers that want managed csoc, xdr, threat hunting an... or Kudelski Security's technology-agnostic mdr with strong analyst recognition (gartner 8 years, forrester, bloor) and o....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider | Mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DTS SolutionTECH-AGNOSTIC | Kudelski SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft endpoint securityHawkEye XDR AgentCustomer endpoint security tools CrowdStrike | Microsoft DefenderSentinelOneSophosCarbon BlackCybereasonCisco Secure Endpoint CrowdStrike |
| SIEM integrations | HawkEye NG-SIEMHawkEye Open XDRCustomer-owned SIEM | SplunkMicrosoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not publicly disclosed. Forrester TEI study (Feb 2024) modeled $22.4M in benefits vs $6.4M costs over 3 years for a composite organization. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Tiered subscription packages by log-source count and EPS, with custom-tailored packages for additional log sources, EPS and retention. Public prices are not published. | Per-endpoint pricing, not based on data volume. Modular and all-in-one subscription options. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Package limits are defined by log sources and events per second, so high-volume environments should model ingestion growth before contract.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, contractual SLAs, service credits or MTTD/MTTR metrics.. DFIR is included only in Premium Platinum in the package table; lower tiers list it as an add-on.. Managed SOAR and many adjacent managed services are add-ons rather than guaranteed base MDR scope.. The public AI SOC page says response actions are analyst-approved, so buyers should document which containment actions DTS can execute and whose approval is required. | Four MDR variants (Resolute, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, OT) with different pricing. Clarify which product fits before quoting.. DFIR beyond containment is a separate paid engagement, not included in base MDR. OT/ICS coverage requires the dedicated MDR for OT variant, priced separately. No public pricing at all. Enterprise positioning suggests premium cost. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Lite Bronze, Baseline Silver, Advanced Gold, Premium Platinum, Custom-tailored package | Custom enterprise agreements |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | SlackPortalPhoneEmail |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | MEA | EuropeNorth America |
| Onboarding | HawkEye describes an onsite discovery workshop, package selection, secure onboarding, service delivery and secure offboarding. No standard calendar timeline was found. | Weeks. Starts with a business context assessment covering strategy, risk exposure, and likely threats. |
| Industry focus | Critical InfrastructureEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingGovernmentFinancial ServicesHealthcareRetailTechnologyTelecommunicationsSmart CitiesTransportation | Critical InfrastructureEnergy & UtilitiesFinancial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentManufacturing (OT/ICS) |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published as a specific number |
| MTTR | Not published | Less than 15 minutes on high-severity incidents (vendor-published, not independently validated) |
| Community view | HawkEye has strong vendor-controlled detail for package tiers, dashboard access, retention, CSOC/XDR capabilities and regional SOC positioning, but little independent MDR-specific review signal in public English-language communities. Buyers should validate analyst quality, response authority and pricing through references. | Well-recognized by analysts (Gartner 8 years running, Forrester Strong Performer, Bloor Champion) but almost invisible in community channels. Zero meaningful reviews on G2 or PeerSpot, no Reddit discussion. Enterprise and critical infrastructure buyers don't post much, which leaves a validation gap. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 45001SOC 2 Type IMITRE ATT&CK | ISO 27001:2022ISO 27017:2015ISO 27018:2019SOC 2 Type IICyber Essentials (UK)UK G-Cloud |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 45001SOC 2 Type I logo shown on DTS siteSOC-CMM risk-driven certification logo shown on DTS siteSWIFT CSP logo shown on DTS site | ISO 27001:2022 (certified since 2015)ISO 27017:2015 (certified since 2022)ISO 27018:2019 (certified since 2022)SOC 2 Type II (AICPA)Cyber Essentials (UK government scheme)UK G-Cloud (certified cloud security provider)Microsoft Solutions Partner (Security)Google Cloud Partner (MSSP)FIRST Membership (Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams) |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
| Data retention | HawkEye package pages publish 3 months hot storage, 6 months warm storage and 12 months cold storage across service tiers, with longer retention available through a custom-tailored package. Advanced and Premium tier pages also describe standard collected-log retention; buyers should reconcile final retention language in the contract. | 12 months hot data. Unlimited ingestion, priced per endpoint rather than by data volume. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between DTS Solution and Kudelski Security?
DTS Solution is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DTS Solution covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Kudelski Security.
How do DTS Solution and Kudelski Security differ in response capabilities?
DTS Solution supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Kudelski Security supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does DTS Solution pricing compare to Kudelski Security?
DTS Solution pricing: Not published. Kudelski Security pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Forrester TEI study (Feb 2024) modeled $22.4M in benefits vs $6.4M costs over 3 years for a composite organization.. Watch for with DTS Solution: Package limits are defined by log sources and events per second, so high-volume environments should model ingestion growth before contract.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, contractual SLAs, service credits or MTTD/MTTR metrics.. Watch for with Kudelski Security: Four MDR variants (Resolute, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, OT) with different pricing. Clarify which product fits before quoting.; DFIR beyond containment is a separate paid engagement, not included in base MDR.
Should I choose DTS Solution or Kudelski Security?
Choose DTS Solution if: middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider. Choose Kudelski Security if: mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace. DTS Solution is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual MTTD/MTTR before sales. Kudelski Security is not ideal for sMBs or budget-conscious buyers. No public pricing and enterprise positioning signals premium cost..
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.