AhnLab vs Kudelski Security
AhnLab is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. AhnLab targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Kudelski Security serves Mid-market and Enterprise. AhnLab includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Kudelski Security (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
AhnLab is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. AhnLab targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Kudelski Security serves Mid-market and Enterprise. AhnLab includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Kudelski Security (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
AhnLab is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Kudelski Security is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | South Korean and APAC organizations that already run AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR | Mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- South Korean and APAC organizations that already run AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | AhnLabPLATFORM | Kudelski SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | AhnLab EDR | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft DefenderSentinelOneSophosCarbon BlackCybereasonCisco Secure Endpoint |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | SplunkMicrosoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContain | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not publicly disclosed. Forrester TEI study (Feb 2024) modeled $22.4M in benefits vs $6.4M costs over 3 years for a composite organization. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Based on the number of AhnLab EDR agents installed. AhnLab says EDR Premium includes the EDR license fee and that service cost requires a separate inquiry. | Per-endpoint pricing, not based on data volume. Modular and all-in-one subscription options. |
| Hidden cost warnings | The service is tied to AhnLab's endpoint stack, so buyers with existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender or SentinelOne deployments should price migration and overlap.. AhnLab separates basic MDR from paid EDR Premium. Buyers should confirm which response actions are included in each tier.. Public materials do not disclose minimum seats, regional availability, SLA terms or retained-forensics scope.. Fuller cross-domain detection may require AhnLab XDR, TIP, MDS, cloud or CPS products outside endpoint MDR. | Four MDR variants (Resolute, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, OT) with different pricing. Clarify which product fits before quoting.. DFIR beyond containment is a separate paid engagement, not included in base MDR. OT/ICS coverage requires the dedicated MDR for OT variant, priced separately. No public pricing at all. Enterprise positioning suggests premium cost. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Per EDR agent, Custom quote, EDR Premium paid tier | Custom enterprise agreements |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | SlackPortalPhoneEmail |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | APAC | EuropeNorth America |
| Onboarding | Requires AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR plus external transmission of AhnLab EDR detection logs. Public materials do not publish a standard onboarding timeline. | Weeks. Starts with a business context assessment covering strategy, risk exposure, and likely threats. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesManufacturingGovernmentHealthcare | Critical InfrastructureEnergy & UtilitiesFinancial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentManufacturing (OT/ICS) |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published as a specific number |
| MTTR | Not published | Less than 15 minutes on high-severity incidents (vendor-published, not independently validated) |
| Community view | AhnLab has stronger public proof around endpoint products than around MDR delivery. English-language MDR-specific buyer reviews are sparse, so buyers should validate analyst quality, escalation process and regional support through references. | Well-recognized by analysts (Gartner 8 years running, Forrester Strong Performer, Bloor Champion) but almost invisible in community channels. Zero meaningful reviews on G2 or PeerSpot, no Reddit discussion. Enterprise and critical infrastructure buyers don't post much, which leaves a validation gap. |
| Compliance | MITRE ATT&CK evaluationsSE Labs Advanced Security Test | ISO 27001:2022ISO 27017:2015ISO 27018:2019SOC 2 Type IICyber Essentials (UK)UK G-Cloud |
| Certifications | SE Labs AAA rating for AhnLab EPP/EDRMITRE ATT&CK Evaluations Round 7 participant | ISO 27001:2022 (certified since 2015)ISO 27017:2015 (certified since 2022)ISO 27018:2019 (certified since 2022)SOC 2 Type II (AICPA)Cyber Essentials (UK government scheme)UK G-Cloud (certified cloud security provider)Microsoft Solutions Partner (Security)Google Cloud Partner (MSSP)FIRST Membership (Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams) |
| Founded | 1995 | 2012 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. AhnLab EDR collects endpoint behavior, file, registry, network, process, system and Windows event-log data for analysis in EDR Analyzer. | 12 months hot data. Unlimited ingestion, priced per endpoint rather than by data volume. |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between AhnLab and Kudelski Security?
AhnLab is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). AhnLab covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Kudelski Security.
How do AhnLab and Kudelski Security differ in response capabilities?
AhnLab supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Kudelski Security supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does AhnLab pricing compare to Kudelski Security?
AhnLab pricing: Not published. Kudelski Security pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Forrester TEI study (Feb 2024) modeled $22.4M in benefits vs $6.4M costs over 3 years for a composite organization.. Watch for with AhnLab: The service is tied to AhnLab's endpoint stack, so buyers with existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender or SentinelOne deployments should price migration and overlap.; AhnLab separates basic MDR from paid EDR Premium. Buyers should confirm which response actions are included in each tier.. Watch for with Kudelski Security: Four MDR variants (Resolute, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, OT) with different pricing. Clarify which product fits before quoting.; DFIR beyond containment is a separate paid engagement, not included in base MDR.
Should I choose AhnLab or Kudelski Security?
Choose AhnLab if: south Korean and APAC organizations that already run AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR. Choose Kudelski Security if: mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace. AhnLab is not ideal for buyers that want MDR layered on top of existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, SentinelOne or other endpoint tools. Kudelski Security is not ideal for sMBs or budget-conscious buyers. No public pricing and enterprise positioning signals premium cost..
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.