DOT Security vs ITC Secure
DOT Security is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. DOT Security targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; ITC Secure serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DOT Security includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for ITC Secure (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
DOT Security is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. DOT Security targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; ITC Secure serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DOT Security includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for ITC Secure (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity).
DOT Security (Services firm) and ITC Secure (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize DOT Security's dot security is a pragmatic fit for smaller organizations that want managed cybersecurity help ar... or ITC Secure's itc secure fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mxdr with pulse portal visibility, service re....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance | Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DOT SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | ITC SecureTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | None listed | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom quote. No public price bands found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. DOT does not publish endpoint, user, device or package pricing for MDR. | Custom quote. ITC Secure does not publish MXDR powered by Pulse package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | DOT positions its offering as a managed cybersecurity program, so buyers should separate endpoint MDR cost from compliance, vCISO, network monitoring and backup scope.. No public response SLA or detection metric was found.. Public materials emphasize customized stack design, which can make quotes harder to compare against per-endpoint MDR products.. Specific response actions and approval rules are not published. | Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison.. ITC Secure publishes broad MXDR components, including endpoint, identity, Office 365, cloud apps, storage, vulnerability management and OT. Buyers should confirm which components are included in their quote.. Public pages do not define default response authority, so containment permissions and approval rules should be written into the contract.. Incident response is listed as a separate service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MXDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom, MXDR powered by Pulse, Managed services, Incident Response |
| Channels | EmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | |
| Onboarding | DOT says every relationship begins with a cybersecurity risk audit or gap analysis, followed by stack design, deployment and ongoing management. No standard MDR onboarding timeline was found. | Not published. ITC Secure publishes security engineering and SOC onboarding as a build-and-deploy service, but no standard MXDR implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HospitalityHealthcareManufacturingGovernmentConstructionFinancial Services | Not published |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | DOT Security has a current vendor-controlled MDR signal through its endpoint security page and a clear U.S.-based SOC story. Independent MDR review volume was not found in this pass, so buyer diligence should rely on references, a proof of value and careful quote scoping. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on ITC Secure's Microsoft focus, Microsoft Verified Managed XDR status, Pulse portal, long managed-service history and broad MXDR service components. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, SOC operating model and exact component inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | HIPAACMMCNISTCCPAGDPR | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1 |
| Certifications | – | Microsoft Verified Managed XDRMicrosoft Solutions Partner in SecurityMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Modern WorkMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Infrastructure AzureMicrosoft Intelligent Security AssociationCyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1ISO/IEC 27001Great Place to Work Certification |
| Founded | 2020 | – |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published. ITC Secure says Pulse provides visibility into customer security posture, activities, incident trends, Microsoft license consumption and service metrics. No standard public MXDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between DOT Security and ITC Secure?
DOT Security is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DOT Security covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for ITC Secure.
How do DOT Security and ITC Secure differ in response capabilities?
DOT Security supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable. ITC Secure supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable.
How does DOT Security pricing compare to ITC Secure?
DOT Security pricing: Custom quote. No public price bands found.. ITC Secure pricing: Not published. Watch for with DOT Security: DOT positions its offering as a managed cybersecurity program, so buyers should separate endpoint MDR cost from compliance, vCISO, network monitoring and backup scope.; No public response SLA or detection metric was found.. Watch for with ITC Secure: Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison..
Should I choose DOT Security or ITC Secure?
Choose DOT Security if: sMB and mid-market buyers that want endpoint MDR plus broader managed security guidance. Choose ITC Secure if: microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform. DOT Security is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing, named EDR support or published detection metrics. ITC Secure is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.