Devoteam vs WithSecure
Devoteam is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. WithSecure is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Devoteam targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; WithSecure serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Devoteam includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud, Identity), compared to 1 for WithSecure (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
Devoteam is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. WithSecure is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Devoteam targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; WithSecure serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Devoteam includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud, Identity), compared to 1 for WithSecure (Endpoint).
WithSecure is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Devoteam is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm | European mid-market organizations prioritizing EU data residency, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA compliance |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European mid-market organizations prioritizing EU data residency, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA compliance
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DevoteamTECH-AGNOSTIC | WithSecurePLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft security toolsCustomer endpoint security tools | WithSecure Elements EDR (required for MDR service) |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelCustomer SIEM platformsGoogle Security Operations | Microsoft Sentinel (native Azure Marketplace connector)Any SIEM via Elements Connector (Syslog forwarding) |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantine |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not publicly disclosed. Custom quotes required. Described as 'competitively priced for mid-sized businesses.' ITPro rated pricing 5/5 stars. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Identity | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote for cloud managed services and managed security. Public MDR prices are not published. | Per-endpoint/per-device/per-user subscription. Monthly or annual billing options. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Devoteam MDR is described as outsourced SIEM platform operations, so buyers should model Sentinel and cloud log ingestion before contracting.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits, SOC locations or formal MDR SLAs.. The service is cloud-centered; teams seeking a packaged endpoint MDR with named containment actions should validate endpoint tooling and response scope.. Devoteam has separate cloud, cybersecurity, Microsoft, AWS and Google Cloud offerings, so scope boundaries between MDR, cloud managed services and advisory work should be written into the contract.. Offboarding terms for SIEM detections, automation scripts, reports and retained logs are not described publicly. | Platform lock-in: requires WithSecure Elements EDR, cannot use competing EDR. Modular pricing: full coverage across identity, cloud, SaaS, and exposure management adds cost beyond base MDR. Ownership transition: being taken private by CVC/Siilasmaa, managed services ARR declined 22% in H1 2025 |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom cloud managed services engagement, Managed Security, Cloud Managed Services, Managed Detection and Response | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | EuropeMEA | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Devoteam describes SIEM platform design and implementation, Infrastructure as Code deployment and managed cloud/security operations, but no standard MDR onboarding timeline. | Not publicly disclosed. Requires Elements EDR deployment first, then MDR subscription activated in Elements Security Center. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailTelecommunicationsManufacturingPublic SectorHealthcare | Financial ServicesManufacturingHealthcareGovernmentEducationTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published. Marketing states 'reaction in minutes, containment within hours.' PeerSpot reviewer reported ~4 minute average alert response (anecdotal). |
| Community view | Devoteam has solid vendor-controlled evidence for cloud MDR, 24x7 monitoring, Sentinel-centered SIEM operations, SOAR automation and multi-cloud security partnerships. Independent MDR-specific buyer reviews are limited, so buyers should validate SOC delivery quality, response authority, cloud log costs and actual managed-service boundaries through references. | PeerSpot 8.0/10 with 100% recommend rate and growing mindshare (0.3% to 1.0% YoY). Gartner Peer Insights 4.5/5 across 144 reviews (all products). Forrester Strong Performer in MDR Europe Q3 2025. Being taken private by CVC/Siilasmaa (delisting expected H1 2026). Consulting divested to Neqst May 2025. Managed services ARR declined 22% in H1 2025. |
| Compliance | GDPRPCI DSSANSSICloud Security AllianceISO | ISO 27001ISAE 3000 (SOC 2 Type 2 equivalent)GDPRNIS2DORA |
| Certifications | AWS Premier Consulting PartnerAWS Managed Services ProviderGoogle Cloud Diamond PartnerGoogle Cloud Managed Services PartnerGoogle Cloud Managed Security Services PartnerGoogle Cloud Security Services Specialized partnerMicrosoft Solutions Partner for SecurityMicrosoft Azure Expert MSP | ISO 27001 (cloud-delivered products and managed security services)ISAE 3000 (assurance-based, SOC 2 Type 2 equivalent)CREST-Accredited CSIR TeamNCSC CIR Level 1 (one of only 9 IR teams globally for Category 1-3 incidents)NCSC CIR Level 2 (via CREST)BSI (German Federal Office for Information Security) Assured IR TeamForrester Strong Performer MDR Europe Q3 2025Gartner Magic Quadrant for Endpoint Protection Platforms 2024AV-TEST Approved Advanced EDR 2024MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations Enterprise 2024 Participant |
| Founded | – | 1988 |
| Data retention | Not published for MDR. Devoteam describes outsourced SIEM platform operations and cloud-managed services, but public pages do not publish default log retention, hot/warm storage or export terms. | 13-14 months for security events, varying by event severity. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Devoteam and WithSecure?
Devoteam is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). WithSecure is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Devoteam covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for WithSecure.
How do Devoteam and WithSecure differ in response capabilities?
Devoteam supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. WithSecure supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Devoteam and included with WithSecure.
How does Devoteam pricing compare to WithSecure?
Devoteam pricing: Not published. WithSecure pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Custom quotes required. Described as 'competitively priced for mid-sized businesses.' ITPro rated pricing 5/5 stars.. Watch for with Devoteam: Devoteam MDR is described as outsourced SIEM platform operations, so buyers should model Sentinel and cloud log ingestion before contracting.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits, SOC locations or formal MDR SLAs.. Watch for with WithSecure: Platform lock-in: requires WithSecure Elements EDR, cannot use competing EDR; Modular pricing: full coverage across identity, cloud, SaaS, and exposure management adds cost beyond base MDR.
Should I choose Devoteam or WithSecure?
Choose Devoteam if: european and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm. Choose WithSecure if: european mid-market organizations prioritizing EU data residency, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA compliance. Devoteam is not ideal for buyers that require public per-endpoint MDR pricing before sales engagement. WithSecure is not ideal for organizations committed to multi-vendor or BYO-EDR strategies (requires WithSecure agent).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.