Devoteam vs Kudelski Security
Devoteam is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Devoteam targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Kudelski Security serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Devoteam includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud, Identity), compared to 5 for Kudelski Security (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Devoteam is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Devoteam targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Kudelski Security serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Devoteam includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Cloud, Identity), compared to 5 for Kudelski Security (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Devoteam (Services firm) and Kudelski Security (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Devoteam's devoteam cloud mdr is strongest for cloud-first organizations that want sentinel-centered siem op... or Kudelski Security's technology-agnostic mdr with strong analyst recognition (gartner 8 years, forrester, bloor) and o....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm | Mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DevoteamTECH-AGNOSTIC | Kudelski SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft security toolsCustomer endpoint security tools | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft DefenderSentinelOneSophosCarbon BlackCybereasonCisco Secure Endpoint |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM platformsGoogle Security Operations Microsoft Sentinel | Splunk Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not publicly disclosed. Forrester TEI study (Feb 2024) modeled $22.4M in benefits vs $6.4M costs over 3 years for a composite organization. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote for cloud managed services and managed security. Public MDR prices are not published. | Per-endpoint pricing, not based on data volume. Modular and all-in-one subscription options. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Devoteam MDR is described as outsourced SIEM platform operations, so buyers should model Sentinel and cloud log ingestion before contracting.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits, SOC locations or formal MDR SLAs.. The service is cloud-centered; teams seeking a packaged endpoint MDR with named containment actions should validate endpoint tooling and response scope.. Devoteam has separate cloud, cybersecurity, Microsoft, AWS and Google Cloud offerings, so scope boundaries between MDR, cloud managed services and advisory work should be written into the contract.. Offboarding terms for SIEM detections, automation scripts, reports and retained logs are not described publicly. | Four MDR variants (Resolute, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, OT) with different pricing. Clarify which product fits before quoting.. DFIR beyond containment is a separate paid engagement, not included in base MDR. OT/ICS coverage requires the dedicated MDR for OT variant, priced separately. No public pricing at all. Enterprise positioning suggests premium cost. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom cloud managed services engagement, Managed Security, Cloud Managed Services, Managed Detection and Response | Custom enterprise agreements |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | SlackPortalPhoneEmail |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | EuropeMEA | EuropeNorth America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Devoteam describes SIEM platform design and implementation, Infrastructure as Code deployment and managed cloud/security operations, but no standard MDR onboarding timeline. | Weeks. Starts with a business context assessment covering strategy, risk exposure, and likely threats. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailTelecommunicationsManufacturingPublic SectorHealthcare | Critical InfrastructureEnergy & UtilitiesFinancial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentManufacturing (OT/ICS) |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published as a specific number |
| MTTR | Not published | Less than 15 minutes on high-severity incidents (vendor-published, not independently validated) |
| Community view | Devoteam has solid vendor-controlled evidence for cloud MDR, 24x7 monitoring, Sentinel-centered SIEM operations, SOAR automation and multi-cloud security partnerships. Independent MDR-specific buyer reviews are limited, so buyers should validate SOC delivery quality, response authority, cloud log costs and actual managed-service boundaries through references. | Well-recognized by analysts (Gartner 8 years running, Forrester Strong Performer, Bloor Champion) but almost invisible in community channels. Zero meaningful reviews on G2 or PeerSpot, no Reddit discussion. Enterprise and critical infrastructure buyers don't post much, which leaves a validation gap. |
| Compliance | GDPRPCI DSSANSSICloud Security AllianceISO | ISO 27001:2022ISO 27017:2015ISO 27018:2019SOC 2 Type IICyber Essentials (UK)UK G-Cloud |
| Certifications | AWS Premier Consulting PartnerAWS Managed Services ProviderGoogle Cloud Diamond PartnerGoogle Cloud Managed Services PartnerGoogle Cloud Managed Security Services PartnerGoogle Cloud Security Services Specialized partnerMicrosoft Solutions Partner for SecurityMicrosoft Azure Expert MSP | ISO 27001:2022 (certified since 2015)ISO 27017:2015 (certified since 2022)ISO 27018:2019 (certified since 2022)SOC 2 Type II (AICPA)Cyber Essentials (UK government scheme)UK G-Cloud (certified cloud security provider)Microsoft Solutions Partner (Security)Google Cloud Partner (MSSP)FIRST Membership (Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams) |
| Founded | – | 2012 |
| Data retention | Not published for MDR. Devoteam describes outsourced SIEM platform operations and cloud-managed services, but public pages do not publish default log retention, hot/warm storage or export terms. | 12 months hot data. Unlimited ingestion, priced per endpoint rather than by data volume. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Devoteam and Kudelski Security?
Devoteam is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Kudelski Security is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Devoteam covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Kudelski Security.
How do Devoteam and Kudelski Security differ in response capabilities?
Devoteam supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Kudelski Security supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Devoteam pricing compare to Kudelski Security?
Devoteam pricing: Not published. Kudelski Security pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Forrester TEI study (Feb 2024) modeled $22.4M in benefits vs $6.4M costs over 3 years for a composite organization.. Watch for with Devoteam: Devoteam MDR is described as outsourced SIEM platform operations, so buyers should model Sentinel and cloud log ingestion before contracting.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits, SOC locations or formal MDR SLAs.. Watch for with Kudelski Security: Four MDR variants (Resolute, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, OT) with different pricing. Clarify which product fits before quoting.; DFIR beyond containment is a separate paid engagement, not included in base MDR.
Should I choose Devoteam or Kudelski Security?
Choose Devoteam if: european and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm. Choose Kudelski Security if: mid-market and enterprise teams with existing EDR/SIEM who want a technology-agnostic MDR layer, not a rip-and-replace. Devoteam is not ideal for buyers that require public per-endpoint MDR pricing before sales engagement. Kudelski Security is not ideal for sMBs or budget-conscious buyers. No public pricing and enterprise positioning signals premium cost..
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.