DefenseStorm vs Tesorion
DefenseStorm is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DefenseStorm targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DefenseStorm includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
DefenseStorm is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DefenseStorm targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DefenseStorm includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
DefenseStorm (Platform vendor) and Tesorion (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize DefenseStorm's defensestorm is a strong vertical mdr candidate for u.s or Tesorion's tesorion mdr fits dutch buyers that want local mdr delivered through t-soc and backed by t-cert, ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | U.S. community banks, regional banks and credit unions that need MDR plus examiner-ready evidence | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- U.S. community banks, regional banks and credit unions that need MDR plus examiner-ready evidence
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefenseStormTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrikeCarbon BlackOther EDR options supported through customer-specific integration | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | GRID ActiveCustomer security logs and event sources | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Predictable employee-count-based pricing with unlimited data ingestion, according to current vendor homepage copy. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | DefenseStorm is built exclusively for U.S. banks and credit unions, so it is a poor fit outside that vertical.. Response is collaborative/guided: the customer makes final decisions on actions in the environment.. No public contractual SLA table or service-credit terms were found despite published performance metrics.. Pricing varies by institution size, coverage tier and product mix, but no public price bands or minimums are disclosed. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | |
| Onboarding | G2 lists average time to implement as 1 month. Vendor site does not publish a standard MDR onboarding SLA. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesBankingCredit Unions | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | <15 minutes mean time to detect across the customer base (vendor-reported) | Not published |
| MTTR | <24 hours mean time to respond (vendor-reported) | Not published |
| Community view | G2 shows 4.8/5 across 29 reviews, with reviewers concentrated in banking and financial services and G2 category filters including MDR and EDR. Review themes are positive around customer support, team quality, onboarding and ease of use. Negative themes include querying/log complexity, asset discovery and navigation/reporting friction. Public Reddit signal was not meaningful in this pass. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | FFIECGLBANCUANIST CSFCRI Profile | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | – | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2014 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. DefenseStorm publishes GRID Active self-service restore/data retention content, but public retention terms were not found. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between DefenseStorm and Tesorion?
DefenseStorm is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DefenseStorm covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do DefenseStorm and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
DefenseStorm supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does DefenseStorm pricing compare to Tesorion?
DefenseStorm pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with DefenseStorm: DefenseStorm is built exclusively for U.S. banks and credit unions, so it is a poor fit outside that vertical.; Response is collaborative/guided: the customer makes final decisions on actions in the environment.. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose DefenseStorm or Tesorion?
Choose DefenseStorm if: u.S. community banks, regional banks and credit unions that need MDR plus examiner-ready evidence. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. DefenseStorm is not ideal for organizations outside U.S. banks and credit unions. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.