Defendable vs Trend Micro
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Trend Micro is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Trend Micro serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Trend Micro (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Trend Micro is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Trend Micro serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Trend Micro (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Trend Micro is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Defendable is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Mid-market and enterprise organizations (251+ users) already invested in Trend Micro ecosystem |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations (251+ users) already invested in Trend Micro ecosystem
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | Trend MicroPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Trend Micro |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Splunk Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not publicly disclosed. Custom pricing via quote. |
| Minimum seats | None | 251 |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Credit-based system under 12-month contract. Tiered pricing by user count (251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-2,000). Credits drawn down monthly. PAYG available for additional usage beyond credits. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Minimum 251 users eliminates small businesses. Best performance requires full Trend Vision One stack. Third-party EDR integration is less effective.. Extended data retention (beyond 30 days) costs extra, up to 365 days available. Credit model means unused credits expire at contract end unless moved to other Trend solutions |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Annual, PAYG |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Requires Vision One deployment before MDR onboarding. Specific timeline not published. |
| Industry focus | Not published | Financial ServicesHealthcareManufacturingGovernmentEnergy |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader for 20 consecutive years in endpoint protection. Vision One rated 8.6/10 on PeerSpot, ranked #2 in XDR. MITRE ATT&CK 2024: 100% detection with 86% actionable rate. Praised for unified visibility and platform breadth. Criticized for requiring Trend platform commitment and pooled analyst model. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001FedRAMPHIPAAGDPR |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001FedRAMPGartner Magic Quadrant Leader (Endpoint Protection, 20 consecutive years)MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations participant (2024) |
| Founded | 2020 | 1988 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | 30 days default for raw data, up to 365 days with extended storage. Alert workbenches retained 180 days. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and Trend Micro?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Trend Micro is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Trend Micro.
How do Defendable and Trend Micro differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Trend Micro supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Defendable pricing compare to Trend Micro?
Defendable pricing: Not published. Trend Micro pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Custom pricing via quote. (251-seat minimum). Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with Trend Micro: Minimum 251 users eliminates small businesses; Best performance requires full Trend Vision One stack. Third-party EDR integration is less effective..
Should I choose Defendable or Trend Micro?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose Trend Micro if: mid-market and enterprise organizations (251+ users) already invested in Trend Micro ecosystem. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. Trend Micro is not ideal for small businesses under 251 users (minimum requirement eliminates SMBs).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.