Defendable vs ThreatSpike
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ThreatSpike is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ThreatSpike serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for ThreatSpike (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ThreatSpike is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ThreatSpike serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for ThreatSpike (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
ThreatSpike is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Defendable is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Lean IT or security teams that want the provider to own both IT operations context and security response |
| Price | Custom quote | Managed IT + security bundle: $135/user/mo |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · No approval |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Lean IT or security teams that want the provider to own both IT operations context and security response
- Price
- Managed IT + security bundle: $135/user/mo
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · No approval
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | ThreatSpikePLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | ThreatSpike proprietary EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Third-party feeds supported, specific SIEM integrations not published |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Fully Autonomous |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateContain |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Published fixed $135/user/month for broader managed IT + security subscription, not MDR-only. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Published fixed per-user monthly subscription bundling fully managed IT, defensive security and offensive security. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | ThreatSpike is not a narrow MDR-only SKU. Buyers that only want monitoring on top of an existing IT team may be buying a broader managed IT replacement model.. The platform is proprietary and built in-house. Validate exit process, data export and whether existing EDR/SIEM investments can remain primary.. $135/user/month can be attractive if it replaces IT, MDR and pen testing vendors, but expensive if treated as MDR-only.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit language was found despite the 2 to 5 minute response claim. |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | Not published | HospitalityFinancial ServicesManufacturingProfessional ServicesRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | 2 to 5 minute automated incident response/resolve time (vendor-reported) |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | G2 shows 4.9/5 across 32 reviews, with most reviews categorized under Managed Security Services and a mix of SMB, mid-market and enterprise reviewers. Review themes support the consolidation, support and pricing story, but independent analyst coverage appears thinner than larger MDR providers and public review volume is still modest. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusPCI DSS |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusCREST-certified penetration testing providerPCI DSS compliant |
| Founded | 2020 | 2011 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and ThreatSpike?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatSpike is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for ThreatSpike.
How do Defendable and ThreatSpike differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatSpike supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment) and acts without approval. Incident response is not included with Defendable and included with ThreatSpike.
How does Defendable pricing compare to ThreatSpike?
Defendable pricing: Not published. ThreatSpike pricing: Published fixed $135/user/month for broader managed IT + security subscription, not MDR-only.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with ThreatSpike: ThreatSpike is not a narrow MDR-only SKU. Buyers that only want monitoring on top of an existing IT team may be buying a broader managed IT replacement model.; The platform is proprietary and built in-house. Validate exit process, data export and whether existing EDR/SIEM investments can remain primary..
Should I choose Defendable or ThreatSpike?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose ThreatSpike if: sMB and mid-market organizations that want to replace fragmented MSP, MDR and penetration-testing vendors with one fixed-price provider. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. ThreatSpike is not ideal for organizations seeking a narrow MDR overlay on top of an existing mature SOC and tool stack.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.