Defendable vs TENEX.AI
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. TENEX.AI is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; TENEX.AI serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for TENEX.AI (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. TENEX.AI is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; TENEX.AI serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for TENEX.AI (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity).
Defendable (Services firm) and TENEX.AI (AI-native MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly... or TENEX.AI's tenex.ai fits buyers that want an ai-native mdr model with human analyst oversight and are alread....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Mid-market and enterprise buyers evaluating AI-native MDR instead of a traditional analyst-heavy model |
| Price | Custom quote | $99K-$199K/package; billing period unstated |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers evaluating AI-native MDR instead of a traditional analyst-heavy model
- Price
- $99K-$199K/package; billing period unstated
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | TENEX.AITECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrike FalconSentinelOne Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Google Security OperationsGoogle Chronicle Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Vendor-published $99,000-$199,000 package range: $99,000 for 25TB Essential AI-Native MDR, $149,000 for 50TB Standard 24/7 MDR, and $199,000 for 100TB Enhanced + 24/7 MDR. Billing period not stated. Enterprise is custom. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Package pricing by telemetry tier plus custom enterprise quotes. The homepage lists 25TB, 50TB and 100TB MDR packages, but the billing period and overage terms are not stated on the page. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Homepage pricing is published by TB tier, but billing period, overage rates and telemetry-source assumptions are not stated.. No public contractual SLA found.. No public breach warranty found.. Exact response approval rules are not published.. Ticketing integrations, data retention and evidence export details are not published. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmail |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | Not published | TechnologyFinancial ServicesBusiness Services |
| MTTD | Not published | AI telemetry analysis within a minute, vendor-reported in third-party coverage |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | TENEX.AI is a young AI-native MDR provider with public funding coverage and partner claims, but independent practitioner review volume is still thin. The main public evidence is official product material, a January 2025 launch announcement and March 2026 funding coverage. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | – |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | – |
| Founded | 2020 | 2024 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and TENEX.AI?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). TENEX.AI is an AI-native MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for TENEX.AI.
How do Defendable and TENEX.AI differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. TENEX.AI supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Defendable and included with TENEX.AI.
How does Defendable pricing compare to TENEX.AI?
Defendable pricing: Not published. TENEX.AI pricing: Vendor-published $99,000-$199,000 package range: $99,000 for 25TB Essential AI-Native MDR, $149,000 for 50TB Standard 24/7 MDR, and $199,000 for 100TB Enhanced + 24/7 MDR. Billing period not stated. Enterprise is custom.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with TENEX.AI: Homepage pricing is published by TB tier, but billing period, overage rates and telemetry-source assumptions are not stated.; No public contractual SLA found..
Should I choose Defendable or TENEX.AI?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose TENEX.AI if: mid-market and enterprise buyers evaluating AI-native MDR instead of a traditional analyst-heavy model. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. TENEX.AI is not ideal for buyers who need complete public pricing, including billing period and overage terms, before a sales call.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.