Defendable vs SECUINFRA
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SECUINFRA serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for SECUINFRA (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SECUINFRA serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for SECUINFRA (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Defendable (Services firm) and SECUINFRA (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly... or SECUINFRA's fits german and eu buyers that put data sovereignty first and want a partner that will work insid....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | German SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- German SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | SECUINFRATECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrikeSentinelOne Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | SplunkElasticIBM QRadar Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom quote, varies by chosen tier (full-service MDR, Co-Managed MDR, On-Premises MDR) and integrated SIEM and EDR. Sold direct. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | On-Premises tier requires the customer to keep running their own SIEM hardware and licensing. Co-Managed tier means the customer's team still executes part of the response. No published SLA, response timing depends on the underlying SIEM and EDR you bring |
| Data portability | Partial | Full |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Vendor reports onboarding compressed from 1 week to 1 day for Microsoft-stack customers |
| Industry focus | Not published | ManufacturingFinancial ServicesPublic SectorHealthcareEnergy |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | SECUINFRA has a Gartner Peer Insights vendor profile in the MDR category but limited English-language community coverage on G2 and PeerSpot. Most public sentiment comes from German-language IT press and the firm's own publishing. Buyers shopping outside Germany should expect to lean on direct references. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | ISO 27001:2013 |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | ISO 27001:2013 (TÜV Thüringen, scope covers Berlin and Frankfurt) |
| Founded | 2020 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and SECUINFRA?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SECUINFRA is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for SECUINFRA.
How do Defendable and SECUINFRA differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. SECUINFRA supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Defendable and included with SECUINFRA.
How does Defendable pricing compare to SECUINFRA?
Defendable pricing: Not published. SECUINFRA pricing: Not published. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with SECUINFRA: On-Premises tier requires the customer to keep running their own SIEM hardware and licensing; Co-Managed tier means the customer's team still executes part of the response.
Should I choose Defendable or SECUINFRA?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose SECUINFRA if: german SMEs and regulated EU buyers that need on-premises or sovereign cloud delivery for NIS2 and BSI alignment. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. SECUINFRA is not ideal for non-European multinationals needing 24/7 follow-the-sun coverage from regional SOCs.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.