Defendable vs Red Canary
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Red Canary is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Red Canary serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Red Canary (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Red Canary is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Red Canary serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Red Canary (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Defendable (Services firm) and Red Canary (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly... or Red Canary's vendor-agnostic mdr with 9 edr platform integrations and detection-as-code methodology, the broad....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Linux-heavy environments needing purpose-built Linux EDR for containers and Kubernetes |
| Price | Custom quote | Core rates, period unstated: $120/endpoint + $100/user + $250/cloud resource |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Linux-heavy environments needing purpose-built Linux EDR for containers and Kubernetes
- Price
- Core rates, period unstated: $120/endpoint + $100/user + $250/cloud resource
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | Red CanaryTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneCarbon BlackPalo Alto CortexTrend MicroJamfRed Canary Linux EDR Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Core Plan: $120/endpoint + $100/user + $250/cloud resource. Billing period not stated in profile data. Complete and Enterprise plans priced higher. Available through AWS Marketplace. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Resource-based pricing: per-endpoint + per-user + per-cloud-resource. Three tiers: Core (SMB), Complete (mid-market), Enterprise (custom with dedicated support). |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Resource-based pricing (endpoint + user + cloud) can scale unexpectedly as environments grow. Elevated customer churn post-Zscaler acquisition disclosed in Feb 2026 earnings, market mindshare declined 4.2% to 2.9% year-over-year. Single SOC location in Denver with no follow-the-sun model documented. Enterprise tier required for dedicated support and custom features. Vendor-agnostic positioning may erode over time under Zscaler ownership per Forrester |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | SlackTeamsEmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Days to weeks depending on environment complexity and number of integrations |
| Industry focus | Not published | TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentEducation |
| MTTD | Not published | Sub-minute median time to acknowledge (vendor-published, measured from alert reaching analyst) |
| MTTR | Not published | Seconds for automated containment, minutes for analyst-driven response |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | Forrester Wave MDR Leader Q1 2025. G2 4.7/5 (127 reviews, #1 customer satisfaction). Gartner Peer Insights 4.6/5 (131+ reviews). PeerSpot 9.0/10. Product quality remains strong post-Zscaler acquisition, but Zscaler disclosed elevated customer churn in Feb 2026 earnings with market mindshare declining from 4.2% to 2.9% year-over-year. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | SOC 2 Type II (annual independent assessment)ISO 27001:2013 (annual independent assessment)Working toward FedRAMP certification |
| Founded | 2020 | 2014 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Security Data Lake with SQL query interface during service. Specific retention periods available on request. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and Red Canary?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Red Canary is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Red Canary.
How do Defendable and Red Canary differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Red Canary supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Defendable pricing compare to Red Canary?
Defendable pricing: Not published. Red Canary pricing: Core Plan: $120/endpoint + $100/user + $250/cloud resource. Billing period not stated in profile data. Complete and Enterprise plans priced higher. Available through AWS Marketplace.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with Red Canary: Resource-based pricing (endpoint + user + cloud) can scale unexpectedly as environments grow; Elevated customer churn post-Zscaler acquisition disclosed in Feb 2026 earnings, market mindshare declined 4.2% to 2.9% year-over-year.
Should I choose Defendable or Red Canary?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose Red Canary if: organizations with existing EDR investments (CrowdStrike, Microsoft, SentinelOne, Carbon Black, Cortex XDR, Trend Micro, Jamf) wanting MDR layered on top. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. Red Canary is not ideal for global organizations needing follow-the-sun SOC coverage, only Denver SOC confirmed.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.